A role for brassinosteroid signalling in decision-making processes in the Arabidopsis seedling

被引:4
|
作者
Kalbfuss, Nils [1 ]
Strohmayr, Alexander [1 ]
Kegel, Marcel [1 ]
Le, Lien [1 ]
Grosse-Holz, Friederike [1 ]
Brunschweiger, Barbara [1 ]
Stoeckl, Katharina [1 ]
Wiese, Christian [1 ]
Franke, Carina [1 ]
Schiestl, Caroline [1 ]
Prem, Sophia [1 ]
Sha, Shuyao [1 ]
Franz-Oberdorf, Katrin [1 ]
Hafermann, Juliane [1 ]
Thieme, Marc [1 ]
Facher, Eva [2 ]
Palubicki, Wojciech [3 ]
Bolle, Cordelia [4 ]
Assaad, Farhah F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Life Sci, Bot, Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Fac Biol, Systemat Bot & Mycol, Munich, Germany
[3] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Math & Comp Sci, Poznan, Poland
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Plant Mol Biol Bot, Martinsried, Germany
来源
PLOS GENETICS | 2022年 / 18卷 / 12期
关键词
ABSCISIC-ACID; PLANT-GROWTH; GSK3-LIKE KINASES; DE-ETIOLATION; ROOT-GROWTH; CELL; ELONGATION; INTERACTS; MEDIATE; BIN2;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pgen.1010541
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Plants often adapt to adverse conditions via differential growth, whereby limited resources are discriminately allocated to optimize the growth of one organ at the expense of another. Little is known about the decision-making processes that underly differential growth. In this study, we developed a screen to identify decision making mutants by deploying two tools that have been used in decision theory: a well-defined yet limited budget, as well as conflict-f-interest scenarios. A forward genetic screen that combined light and water withdrawal was carried out. This identified BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 2 (BIN2) alleles as decision mutants with "confused" phenotypes. An assessment of organ and cell length suggested that hypocotyl elongation occurred predominantly via cellular elongation. In contrast, root growth appeared to be regulated by a combination of cell division and cell elongation or exit from the meristem. Gain- or loss- of function bin2 mutants were most severely impaired in their ability to adjust cell geometry in the hypocotyl or cell elongation as a function of distance from the quiescent centre in the root tips. This study describes a novel paradigm for root growth under limiting conditions, which depends not only on hypocotyl-versus-root trade-offs in the allocation of limited resources, but also on an ability to deploy different strategies for root growth in response to multiple stress conditions. Author summary The ability to grow in response to limiting, adverse conditions is a survival strategy unique to plants. This study addresses the tight regulation of differential growth in plants, and how growth is achieved under multiple stress conditions, in the absence of a carbon or energy source. We design a screen to identify decision-making mutants by deploying two tools that have been used in decision theory: a well-defined yet limited budget, as well as conflict-of-interest scenarios. We also apply a new combination of stress factors: water stress and light deprivation. Our manuscript addresses tradeoffs in hypocotyl versus root growth, with an emphasis not on growth arrest but rather on enhanced growth responses to abiotic stress factors. Our findings challenge the widely accepted view that root growth correlates with meristem size; we propose alternative root growth strategies for adaptation to adverse, limiting conditions. Our genetic screens have identified the BIN2 clade of shaggy-like kinases as playing a central role in decision-making in the seedling. We address the controversy in the literature regarding brassinosteroid function at a cellular level. This we do by exploring the role of BR signalling in the regulation of cell elongation and geometry in response to abiotic stress cues. Our findings suggest that BIN2 and its homologues are required for the decision as to which growth strategy to adopt under different environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A role for brassinosteroid signalling in decision-making processes in the Arabidopsis seedling (vol 18, e1010541, 2022)
    Kalbfuss, Nils
    Strohmayrr, Alexander
    Kegel, Marcel
    Le, Lien
    GrosseHolz, Friederike
    Brunschweiger, Barbara
    Stockl, Katharina
    Wiese, Christian
    Franke, Carina
    Schiestl, Caroline
    Prem, Sophia
    Sha, Shuyao
    Franzoberdorf, Katrin
    Hafermann, Juliane
    Thieme, Marc
    Facher, Eva
    Palubicki, Wojciech
    Bolle, Cordelia
    Assaad, Farhah F.
    PLOS GENETICS, 2023, 19 (09):
  • [2] The role of stereotypes in decision-making processes
    Bodenhausen, GV
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 25 (01) : 112 - 118
  • [3] The role of opioid processes in reward and decision-making
    Laurent, Vincent
    Morse, Ashleigh K.
    Balleine, Bernard W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 172 (02) : 449 - 459
  • [4] Decision-making processes of children in the context of sustainable diets. Part 2: The role of values in decision-making processes
    Stoll-Hertrampf, Anke
    Valsangiacomo, Federica
    Bender, Ute
    Ross, Sharon
    Bertschy, Franziska
    Kuenzli, Christine
    ERNAHRUNGS UMSCHAU, 2019, 66 (09): : M516 - M524
  • [5] THE ROLE OF PRODUCT SCHEMA IN CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
    NAKAYACHI, K
    KOJIMA, S
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 59 (04): : 220 - 226
  • [6] Strategic decision-making processes: The role of management and context
    Papadakis, VM
    Lioukas, S
    Chambers, D
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1998, 19 (02) : 115 - 147
  • [7] The role of joint attention in cooperative decision-making processes
    Akiyama, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 269 - 269
  • [8] The Role of Assessment in Informing Our Decision-Making Processes
    Woods-Groves, Suzanne
    Hendrickson, Jo M.
    ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2012, 38 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [9] The Role of ECM and its Contribution in Decision-Making Processes
    Zardini, Alessandro
    Mola, Lapo
    Brocke, Jan Vom
    Rossignoli, Cecilia
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2010, 19 (04) : 389 - 406
  • [10] Acquisition decision-making processes: The central role of risk
    Pablo, AL
    Sitkin, SB
    Jemison, DB
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1996, 22 (05) : 723 - 746