Performance comparison of CBT and PIM multicast routing protocols over MPLS networks

被引：1
|
作者：
El-Shenawy, Nada M. [1 ]
El-Derini, Mohamed N. [2 ]
Fahmy, Mahmoud M. [1 ]
El-Alfy, El-Sayed M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Tanta Univ, Dept Comp & Control Engn, Tanta, Egypt
[2] Univ Alexandria, Dept Comp & Syst Engn, Alexandria, Egypt
来源：
2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING & SYSTEMS | 2006年
关键词：
D O I：
10.1109/ICCES.2006.320442
中图分类号：
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) is a promising cutting-edge technology for advanced forwarding of IP packets. Better performance of multicast routing in large-scale networks is expected when it is implemented over MPLS. In this paper, we simulate Core-Based Tree (CBT) multicast routing protocol over MPLS-based networks using NS2, and compare its performance with Protocol-Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM). Simulations are performed for different network topologies with various group sizes using a modified version. of the MPLS Network Simulator (MNS). Results reveal that as the number of source nodes increases CBT gives better performance than PIM-SM in terms of routing table size, join time, and total hop count. On the other hand, PIM-SM has less end-to-end delay than CBT.
引用
收藏
页码：167 / +
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance and resource cost comparisons for the CBT and PIM multicast routing protocols
    Billhartz, T
    Cain, JB
    FarreyGoudreau, E
    Fieg, D
    Batsell, SG
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 1997, 15 (03) : 304 - 315
  • [2] Performance and resource cost comparisons for the CBT and PIM multicast routing protocols in DIS environments
    Billhartz, T
    Cain, JB
    FarreyGoudreau, E
    Fieg, D
    Batsell, S
    [J]. IEEE INFOCOM '96 - FIFTEENTH ANNUAL JOINT CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS SOCIETIES: NETWORKING THE NEXT GENERATION, PROCEEDINGS VOLS 1-3, 1996, : 85 - 93
  • [3] Multicast routing simulator over MPLS networks
    Boudani, A
    Cousin, B
    Jawhar, C
    Doughan, M
    [J]. 36TH ANNUAL SIMULATION SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 327 - 334
  • [4] Performance Comparison of Proactive and Reactive Multicast Routing Protocols over Wireless Mesh Networks
    Azad, Md Saiful
    Anwar, Farhat
    Rahman, Md Arafatur
    Abdalla, Aisha H.
    Priantoro, Akhmad Unggul
    Mahmoud, Omer
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2009, 9 (06): : 55 - 62
  • [5] A performance comparison of multicast routing protocols in ad hoc networks
    Moustafa, H
    Labiod, H
    [J]. PIMRC 2003: 14TH IEEE 2003 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERSONAL, INDOOR AND MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3 2003, 2003, : 497 - 501
  • [6] Performance Comparison of Multicast Routing Protocols for MANETs
    Mohan, Maya
    Bhanu, S. Mary Saira
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 70 : 452 - 454
  • [7] Performance Comparison between Multicast Routing Protocols in MANET
    Adhvaryu, K. U.
    Kamboj, Pariza
    [J]. 2017 4TH IEEE UTTAR PRADESH SECTION INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, COMPUTER AND ELECTRONICS (UPCON), 2017, : 16 - 20
  • [8] A Performance Comparison of Multipath Multicast Routing Protocols for MANET
    Vijayaragavan, S.
    Duraiswamy, K.
    Kalaavathi, B.
    Madhavi, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2009, 9 (11): : 163 - 169
  • [9] A review and performance comparison of QoS multicast routing protocols for MANETs
    Masoudifar, Mina
    [J]. AD HOC NETWORKS, 2009, 7 (06) : 1150 - 1155
  • [10] Performance Comparison of Mobile Ad Hoc Multicast Routing Protocols
    Lee, Joo-Han
    Cho, Jin-Woong
    Lee, Jang-Yeon
    Lee, Hyeon-Seok
    Park, Sung-Kwon
    [J]. 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR COMMUNICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 403 - +
12345