QUALITY INDICATORS OF DIABETES CARE IN PRACTICE

被引:0
|
作者
Kanchanaphibool, Inthira [1 ]
Hirunrassami, Sanita [2 ]
Tongpugdee, Pensri [2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Int Program Social & Adm Pharm, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Phramongkutklao Hosp, Pharm Div, Pharm Informat Unit, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to explore the practicability of using process and outcome indicators to routinely assess the quality of diabetes care. Health care data of diabetic patients using antidiabetic drugs older than 40 years old in 2006-2008 were retrieved from an electronic information system of Phramongkutklao Hospital, Thailand. The process and outcome indicators were taken from the standard of medical care in diabetes of the American Diabetes Association, 2006 - 2008 and other studies. A list of the practical indicators was selected according to the availability and completeness of the electronic data in the information system, consisting of glycemic control, lipid control, and antiplatelet therapy. For process indicators, the percentages of patients with a yearly measured HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, and antiplatelet therapy were 56.5-67.2,87.8-90.2, 76.6-81.4, 71.8-75.5, and 69.7-75.9%, respectively. For outcome indicators, the percentages of patients with most recent blood levels of HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol, triglyceride, and HDL-cholesterol at target levels were 25.1-32.5, 27.7-33.9, 50.1-54.7, and 53.1-62.5%, respectively. The practicability of these quality indicators in determining the quality of diabetes care will depend on the quality of the hospital electronic databases. Among these applicable indicators at this particular setting, the glycemic and lipid control, and antiplatelet therapy seemed to be sufficiently provided according to the standard diabetes care recommendation. However, the poor outcomes as measured by lipid profiles and HbA1c suggested that other intervention may also be necessitated to better these outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1079
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality indicators of diabetes care in Poland
    Taton, J
    Luzniak, P
    Czech, A
    Lyholm, B
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2000, 43 : A230 - A230
  • [2] Quality indicators of nutritional care practice in elderly care
    Malin Skinnars Josefsson
    M. Nydahl
    I. Persson
    Y. Mattsson Sydner
    [J]. The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2017, 21 : 1057 - 1064
  • [3] Quality indicators of nutritional care practice in elderly care
    Josefsson, M. Skinnars
    Nydahl, M.
    Persson, I.
    Sydner, Y. Mattsson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING, 2017, 21 (09): : 1057 - 1064
  • [4] Quality indicators of diabetes care: the Italian experience
    Rossi, M. C.
    Pellegrini, F.
    Cimino, A.
    Giorda, C.
    Meloncelli, I.
    Vespasiani, G.
    De Bigontina, G.
    Valentini, U.
    Nicolucci, A.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2007, 50 : S423 - S423
  • [5] Quality Indicators and Performance Measures in Diabetes Care
    Aron, David C.
    [J]. CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS, 2014, 14 (03) : 1 - 11
  • [6] Quality Indicators and Performance Measures in Diabetes Care
    David C. Aron
    [J]. Current Diabetes Reports, 2014, 14
  • [7] Quality of Indicators for Effectiveness of Care in Diabetes in Tertiary Care Hospital
    Sundresh, N. Junior
    Santhy, T.
    Bensam, A. J.
    Kinzal, I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (08) : 87 - 90
  • [8] INCORPORATING DEMENTIA QUALITY INDICATORS INTO PRIMARY CARE PRACTICE
    Sloane, P. D.
    Kaufer, D. I.
    Lathren, C.
    Dulin, M.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 28 - 28
  • [9] Quality indicators for the care of diabetes mellitus in vulnerable elders
    Shekelle, Paul
    Vijan, Sandeep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2007, 55 : S312 - S317
  • [10] THE HOSPITALIZATIONS FOR DIABETES AS INDICATORS OF THE HEALTH CARE QUALITY TO PEOPLE WITH DIABETES IN ITALY
    Lombardo, F.
    Maggini, M.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIA & PREVENZIONE, 2011, 35 (5-6): : 50 - 51