Aceclofenac-tizanidine in the treatment of acute low back pain: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentric, comparative study against aceclofenac alone

被引:34
|
作者
Pareek, Anil [1 ]
Chandurkar, Nitin [2 ]
Chandanwale, A. S. [3 ]
Ambade, Ratnakar [4 ]
Gupta, Anil [5 ]
Bartakke, Girish [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Ipca Labs Ltd, Med Affairs & Clin Res, Bombay 400067, Maharashtra, India
[2] Ipca Labs Ltd, Clin Res & Dev, Bombay 400067, Maharashtra, India
[3] JJ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Bombay 400008, Maharashtra, India
[4] Indira Gandhi Govt Med Coll, Dept Orthopaed, Nagpur 18, Maharashtra, India
[5] Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan, India
[6] BJ Med Coll, Dept Orthopaed, Pune 411001, Maharashtra, India
[7] Sassoon Hosp, Pune 411001, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Aceclofenac-tizanidine; Acute LBP; Aceclofenac; PRIMARY-CARE; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-009-1019-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Tizanidine and aceclofenac individually have shown efficacy in the treatment of low back pain. The efficacy and tolerability of the combination have not yet been established. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac-tizanidine fixed dose combination against aceclofenac alone in patients with acute low back pain. This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, comparative, multicentric, parallel group study enrolled 197 patients of either sex in the age range of 18-70 years with acute low back pain. The patients were randomized to receive either aceclofenac (100 mg)-tizanidine (2 mg) b.i.d or aceclofenac (100 mg) alone b.i.d for 7 days. The primary efficacy outcomes were pain intensity (on movement, at rest and at night; on VAS scale) and pain relief (on a 5-point verbal rating scale). The secondary efficacy outcomes measures included functional impairment (modified Schober's test and lateral body bending test) and patient's and investigator's global efficacy assessment. aceclofenac-tizanidine was significantly superior to aceclofenac for pain intensity (on movement, at rest and at night; P < 0.05) and pain relief (P = 0.00) on days 3 and 7. There was significant increase in spinal flexion in both the groups from baseline on days 3 and 7 with significant difference in favour of the combination group (P < 0.05). There were significantly more number of patients with excellent to good response for the aceclofenac-tizanidine treatment as compared to aceclofenac alone (P = 0.00). Both the treatments were well tolerated. In this study, aceclofenac-tizanidine combination was more effective than aceclofenac alone and had a favourable safety profile in the treatment of acute low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1836 / 1842
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aceclofenac–tizanidine in the treatment of acute low back pain: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentric, comparative study against aceclofenac alone
    Anil Pareek
    Nitin Chandurkar
    A. S. Chandanwale
    Ratnakar Ambade
    Anil Gupta
    Girish Bartakke
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2009, 18 : 1836 - 1842
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of aceclofenac and drotaverine fixed-dose combination in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized comparative study with aceclofenac
    Pareek, Anil
    Chandurkar, Nitin B.
    Patil, Rajeshree T.
    Agrawal, Swati N.
    Uday, Rajini B.
    Tambe, Sanjaykumar G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 152 (01) : 86 - 90
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Aceclofenac-CR and Aceclofenac in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A 6-Week, Comparative, Randomized, Multicentric, Double-Blind Study
    Pareek, Anil
    Chandurkar, Nitin
    Gupta, Anil
    Sirsikar, Ashish
    Dalal, Bhavik
    Jesalpura, Bhavesh
    Mehrotra, Anoop
    Mukherjee, Arunangshu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2011, 12 (05): : 546 - 553
  • [4] Double-blind, randomized, double-dummy clinical trial comparing the efficacy of ketorolac trometamol and naproxen for acute low back pain
    Plapler, Perola Grinberg
    Scheinberg, Morton Aaron
    Ecclissato, Christina da Cunha
    Bocchi de Oliveira, Monalisa Fernanda
    Amazonas, Roberto Bleuel
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2016, 10 : 1987 - 1993
  • [5] Effects of naratriptan versus naproxen on daily functioning in the acute treatment of migraine: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study
    Stronks, DL
    Tulen, JHM
    Bussmann, HBJ
    Mulder, LJMM
    Passchier, J
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2003, 43 (08): : 845 - 852
  • [6] A double-blind, multicentre, randomised clinical trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of aceclofenac with diclofenac resinate in patients with acute low back pain
    M. Schattenkirchner
    K. A. Milachowski
    [J]. Clinical Rheumatology, 2003, 22 : 127 - 135
  • [7] A double-blind, multicentre, randomised clinical trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of aceclofenac with diclofenac resinate in patients with acute low back pain
    Schattenkirchner, M
    Milachowski, KA
    [J]. CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 22 (02) : 127 - 135
  • [8] Clinical efficacy of Spasmofen® suppository in the emergency treatment of renal colic: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparative trial
    Yakoot, Mostafa
    Salem, Amel
    Yousef, Sameh
    Helmy, Sherine
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2014, 8 : 405 - 410
  • [9] A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy comparative study of gatifloxacin with clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia
    Lode, H
    Aronkyto, T
    Chuchalin, AG
    Jaaskevi, M
    Kahnovskii, I
    Kleutgens, K
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2004, 10 (05) : 403 - 408
  • [10] Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: Comparison of trovafloxacin and amoxicillin in a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study
    O'Doherty, B
    Daniel, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 17 (06) : 441 - 446