Ultrasound Guided Versus Blind Touch Embryo Transfer: The Egyptian Experience

被引:0
|
作者
Azmy, O. [1 ]
Taha, T. [1 ]
Bibars, M. [1 ]
Refaat, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Ctr, Dept Reprod Med, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
UTERINE CAVITY; CLINICAL TOUCH; METAANALYSIS; IVF;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
To study the effect of abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (USG-ET) vs. clinical touch embryo transfer (CT-ET) among Egyptian patients undergoing ICSI procedure on the pregnancy outcomes. Patients and Methods: 853 ICSI cycles were studied. 418 women had USG-ET and 435 had CT-ET. Chemical and clinical pregnancy and implantation rate were assessed. Also the incidence of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage rate were estimated. Results: The clinical pregnancy was almost doubled by using the USG-ET (RR 1.96, 95 % CI =1.03 to 3.75, P<0.0001). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Although patient's discomfort is slightly more while using USG-ET, this technique significantly improves the chances of achieving a successful pregnancy.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:9 / 12
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Embryo transfer: ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch
    Kan, AKS
    Abdalla, HI
    Gafar, AH
    Nappi, L
    Ogunyemi, BO
    Thomas, A
    Ola-ojo, OO
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (05) : 1259 - 1261
  • [3] A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer
    Buckett, WM
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (04) : 1037 - 1041
  • [4] Ultrasound guided versus blind tactile embryo transfer: a prospective randomized study
    Bar-Hava, I
    Meltzer, S.
    Rabinson, J.
    Ayash, I
    Sega, S.
    Tur-Kaspa, I
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 : 7 - 7
  • [5] Ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer: A systematic review & meta-analysis.
    Abou-Setta, AM
    Al-Inany, HG
    Mansour, RT
    Aboulghar, MM
    Serour, GI
    Aboulghar, MA
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S51 - S52
  • [6] Prospective randomized comparison of an ultrasound-guided embryo transfer versus a blind catheter placement.
    Marconi, G
    Young, E
    Vilela, M
    Bello, A
    Young, E
    Sueldo, C
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 : S130 - S130
  • [7] Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women
    Brown, J. A.
    Buckingham, K.
    Abou-Setta, A.
    Buckett, W.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (01):
  • [8] Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women
    Brown, Julie
    Buckingham, Karen
    Buckett, William
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (03):
  • [9] Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women
    Brown, Julie
    Buckingham, Karen
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Buckett, William
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (01):
  • [10] Higher pregnancy rate with hysterometer-guided embryo transfer versus clinical touch
    Herrero, J.
    Stalf, T.
    Manolopoulus, K.
    Mehnert, C.
    Lang, U.
    Gips, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 2 - 3