New therapeutic protocol for improvement of endometrial receptivity (PRIMER) for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) - A pilot study

被引:29
|
作者
Dieamant, Felipe [1 ,2 ]
Vagnini, Laura D. [2 ]
Petersen, Claudia G. [1 ,2 ]
Mauri, Ana L. [1 ,2 ]
Renzi, Adriana [2 ]
Petersen, Bruna [1 ,2 ]
Mattila, Mariana C. [1 ]
Nicoletti, Andreia [1 ,2 ]
Oliveira, Joao Batista A. [1 ,2 ]
Baruffi, Ricardo [1 ,2 ]
Franco, Jose G., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Human Reprod Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Paulista Ctr Diag Res & Training, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
来源
关键词
recurrent implantation failure; endometrial receptivity; therapeutic protocol; granulocyte colony-stimulation factor; platelet-rich plasma; PRIMER; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; PREGNANCY; REGENERATION; THICKNESS; IMPACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.5935/1518-0557.20190035
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate whether or not one should use a new Protocol for Endometrial Receptivity Improvement (PRIMER) based on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and granulocyte colony-stimulation factor (G-CSF) to enhance ongoing pregnancy rates in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Methods: Women undergoing IVF/ICSI were prospectively divided into two groups: - PRIMER/RIF group (n:33): patients with RIF (defined as >= 2embryo transfers (ETs) and at least 5 morphologically good embryos transferred) in which intrauterine PRP injection and subcutaneous G-CSF-injection were performed. - Control group (n:33): patients in their first IVF/ICSI attempt/cycle (without PRP or G-CSF injection). The PRP was prepared using autologous fresh-whole blood processed to increase platelet-concentration in 2 to 4 fold. All patients undergoing the PRP-treatment received 0.7ml of it through intrauterine-injection 48 hours before the ET. G-CSF (300mg/0.5ml) started simultaneously to PRP and was administered subcutaneously every week. Results: Regarding implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates, we found no statistically significant difference (18.2% versus 17.6%, p=0.90; 36.4% versus 30.3%, p=0.61 and 25.0% versus 9.0%, p=0.43, respectively). The use of PRIMER enabled RIF patients (previous ET mu: 4.0 +/- 1.5) to reach similar ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates like those patients who had their first IVF/ICSI cycle attempt (27.3% versus 27.3%, p=0.99). Conclusions: Our results showed, for the first time, evidence that this therapeutic protocol (PRIMER) could be used as a feasible treatment based on biological rationale for patients with RIF, considering its promising outcomes, it is a simple procedure and not associated with patient complications.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 254
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NEW THERAPEUTIC PROTOCOL FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY (PRIMER) FOR PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE (RIF) - A PILOT STUDY.
    Vagnini, L. D.
    Oliveira, J. B.
    Baruffi, R.
    Petersen, C. G.
    Mauri, A. L.
    Mattila, M. C.
    Comar, V. A.
    Renzi, A.
    Petersen, B.
    Nicoletti, A.
    Franco, J. G., Jr.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E240 - E241
  • [2] Receptivity markers in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells of recurrent implantation failure and non-recurrent implantation failure women: A pilot study
    Esmaeilzadeh, Sedighe
    Mohammadi, Akbar
    Mahdinejad, Neda
    Ghofrani, Faezeh
    Ghasemzadeh-Hasankolaei, Mohammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (08) : 1393 - 1402
  • [3] Endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) and microbiome testing for recurrent implantation failure (RIF): a matched case control study
    Bamford, T.
    Polson, D.
    Lowe, P.
    Easter, C.
    Coomarasamy, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I94 - I95
  • [4] Potential innate immunity-related markers of endometrial receptivity and recurrent implantation failure (RIF)
    Basatvat, Shaghayegh
    Russell, Jean Marion
    Saare, Merli
    Thurston, Lisa Marie
    Salumets, Andres
    Fazeli, Alireza
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (04)
  • [5] Ultrastructural markers of tissue endometrial receptivity in patients with recurrent implantation failure
    Melkozerova, O. A.
    Bashmakova, N. V.
    Malgina, G. B.
    Bragina, E. E.
    Michelson, A. A.
    Chistyakova, G. N.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 : 45 - 48
  • [6] ON THE UTILITY OF THE ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY ASSAY (ERA) TO CORRECT RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE (RIF): NOT AS SIMPLE AS IT SEEMS.
    Rose, Bruce I.
    Cover, Lauren
    Brown, S. E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E168 - E168
  • [7] No endometrial receptivity assay of enlightenment for recurrent implantation failure
    Bosch, Allison
    Hipp, Heather S.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (02) : 239 - 240
  • [8] Efficacy of endometrial receptivity testing for recurrent implantation failure in patients with euploid embryo transfers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Lu, Yao
    Mao, Xinyi
    He, Yaqiong
    Wang, Yuan
    Sun, Yun
    [J]. TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [9] Evaluation of endometrial receptivity in recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure
    Canan, Sultan
    Inan, Mehmet Arda
    Erdem, Ahmet
    Demirdag, Erhan
    Gunduz, Mualla Ilknur
    Erdem, Ozlem
    Erdem, Mehmet
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 21 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [10] Endometrial receptivity and its relationship with clinical factors in patients with recurrent implantation failure
    Pankiewicz, Katarzyna
    Opuchlik, Katarzyna
    Pierzynski, Piotr
    Issat, Tadeusz
    Laudanski, Piotr
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 293 : 259 - 259