共 50 条
New therapeutic protocol for improvement of endometrial receptivity (PRIMER) for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) - A pilot study
被引:29
|作者:
Dieamant, Felipe
[1
,2
]
Vagnini, Laura D.
[2
]
Petersen, Claudia G.
[1
,2
]
Mauri, Ana L.
[1
,2
]
Renzi, Adriana
[2
]
Petersen, Bruna
[1
,2
]
Mattila, Mariana C.
[1
]
Nicoletti, Andreia
[1
,2
]
Oliveira, Joao Batista A.
[1
,2
]
Baruffi, Ricardo
[1
,2
]
Franco, Jose G., Jr.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Ctr Human Reprod Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Paulista Ctr Diag Res & Training, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
来源:
关键词:
recurrent implantation failure;
endometrial receptivity;
therapeutic protocol;
granulocyte colony-stimulation factor;
platelet-rich plasma;
PRIMER;
PLATELET-RICH PLASMA;
COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR;
PREGNANCY;
REGENERATION;
THICKNESS;
IMPACT;
GROWTH;
D O I:
10.5935/1518-0557.20190035
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Objective: To evaluate whether or not one should use a new Protocol for Endometrial Receptivity Improvement (PRIMER) based on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and granulocyte colony-stimulation factor (G-CSF) to enhance ongoing pregnancy rates in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Methods: Women undergoing IVF/ICSI were prospectively divided into two groups: - PRIMER/RIF group (n:33): patients with RIF (defined as >= 2embryo transfers (ETs) and at least 5 morphologically good embryos transferred) in which intrauterine PRP injection and subcutaneous G-CSF-injection were performed. - Control group (n:33): patients in their first IVF/ICSI attempt/cycle (without PRP or G-CSF injection). The PRP was prepared using autologous fresh-whole blood processed to increase platelet-concentration in 2 to 4 fold. All patients undergoing the PRP-treatment received 0.7ml of it through intrauterine-injection 48 hours before the ET. G-CSF (300mg/0.5ml) started simultaneously to PRP and was administered subcutaneously every week. Results: Regarding implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates, we found no statistically significant difference (18.2% versus 17.6%, p=0.90; 36.4% versus 30.3%, p=0.61 and 25.0% versus 9.0%, p=0.43, respectively). The use of PRIMER enabled RIF patients (previous ET mu: 4.0 +/- 1.5) to reach similar ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates like those patients who had their first IVF/ICSI cycle attempt (27.3% versus 27.3%, p=0.99). Conclusions: Our results showed, for the first time, evidence that this therapeutic protocol (PRIMER) could be used as a feasible treatment based on biological rationale for patients with RIF, considering its promising outcomes, it is a simple procedure and not associated with patient complications.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 254
页数:5
相关论文