Safety and efficacy of repeat Y90 radioembolization to the same hepatic arterial territory

被引:7
|
作者
Badar, Wali [1 ]
Van Ha, Thuong [2 ]
Zangan, Steven [2 ]
Navuluri, Rakesh [2 ]
Pillai, Anjana [2 ]
Baker, Talia [2 ]
Dalag, Leonard [2 ]
Han, Ross [2 ]
Ahmed, Osman [2 ]
机构
[1] Rosalind Franklin Univ Med & Sci, N Chicago, IL 60064 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Sect Intervent Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2021年 / 94卷 / 1119期
关键词
DISEASE;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20200752
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To study the efficacy and safety of repeat transarterial radioembolization (TARE) to similar hepatic arterial territories. Methods: Between 3/2011 and 4/2019, 26 patients (25 males and 1 Female, Mean Age: 65 yo, SD: 11.7 yo, Range: 18-83.0 yo) received TARE with Y90 glass microspheres to treat recurrent or residual primary disease in similar hepatic arterial lobe or segments. Tumor response was evaluated by imaging using the modified-RECIST criteria. Incidence of RILD and adverse events were categorized by a standardized scale using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0. Results: Mean cumulative activity after the first treatment was 2.50 GBq (SD:1.04 GBq, Range:0.61-4.93 GBq) and second treatment was 2.27 GBq (SD:1.01 GBq, Range:0.92-5.46 GBq). Mean interval time between initial and repeat treatments was 9.6 months (Range: 1-53 months). Tumor responses were complete, partial, or progression in 73% (n = 19/26), 23% (n = 6/26), and 4% (n = 1/26) in repeat treatment patients, respectively. The incidence of RILD was 0%. Toxicity after first and second treatment was seen in 19% (n = 5/26) & 23% (n = 6/26) patients, respectively, and were all of CTCAE Grade 2. No significant predictors of treatment toxicity for repeat treatment were identified except increased MELD score (p = 0.04). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with repeat treatment showed a median survival of 15.0 months (95% CI 8.8-21.1 months) and 19.0 months (95% CI 8.1-29.9 months) in patients who only received one treatment with a p value of 0.485. Conclusion: Repeat TARE with glass microspheres was an effective and safe treatment strategy for disease management in patients with residual or recurrent disease to the similar hepatic arterial territories without any major treatment related toxicity. Advances in knowledge: Although safety and efficacy of repeat radioembolism has been studied, no study has focused on repeat treatment to similar hepatic arterial territories. The current study shows that repeat treatment to the same hepatic arterial territory is as safe as single treatment to the same territory.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study Protocol: Efficacy and Safety of Radioembolization (REM) as an Early Modality (EM) Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (BR) to the Liver with Y90 (REMEMBR Y90)
    Wu, Richard
    Gogineni, Keerthi
    Meisel, Jane
    Szabo, Stephen
    Thirunavu, Meenakshi
    Friend, Sarah
    Bercu, Zachary
    Sethi, Ila
    Natarajan, Neela
    Switchenko, Jeffrey
    Levy, Jason
    Abdalla, Eddie
    Weakland, Laura
    Kalinsky, Kevin
    Kokabi, Nima
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (11) : 1725 - 1734
  • [2] Study Protocol: Efficacy and Safety of Radioembolization (REM) as an Early Modality (EM) Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (BR) to the Liver with Y90 (REMEMBR Y90)
    Richard Wu
    Keerthi Gogineni
    Jane Meisel
    Stephen Szabo
    Meenakshi Thirunavu
    Sarah Friend
    Zachary Bercu
    Ila Sethi
    Neela Natarajan
    Jeffrey Switchenko
    Jason Levy
    Eddie Abdalla
    Laura Weakland
    Kevin Kalinsky
    Nima Kokabi
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2022, 45 : 1725 - 1734
  • [3] Effect of Patient Breathing on Y90 PET Dosimetry for Y90 Radioembolization of Liver Cancer
    Yu, N.
    Qu, H.
    Srinivas, S.
    Stephans, K.
    Abdel-Wahab, M.
    Xia, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S124 - S124
  • [4] Repeat 90Y-microsphere radioembolization for hepatic malignancies: Safety and patient selection issues
    Kennedy, A. S.
    Dezarn, W. A.
    McNeillie, P.
    England, M.
    Overton, C.
    Sailer, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [5] Safety and Efficacy of Y-90 Radioembolization After Prior Major Hepatic Resection
    Markus Zimmermann
    Maximilian Schulze-Hagen
    Martin Liebl
    Federico Pedersoli
    Fabian Goerg
    Tom Florian Ulmer
    Alexander Heinzel
    Peter Isfort
    Christiane Kuhl
    Philipp Bruners
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2017, 40 : 1206 - 1212
  • [6] Safety and Efficacy of Y-90 Radioembolization After Prior Major Hepatic Resection
    Zimmermann, Markus
    Schulze-Hagen, Maximilian
    Liebl, Martin
    Pedersoli, Federico
    Goerg, Fabian
    Ulmer, Tom Florian
    Heinzel, Alexander
    Isfort, Peter
    Kuhl, Christiane
    Bruners, Philipp
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 40 (08) : 1206 - 1212
  • [7] Comparison between Y90 Radioembolization Plus Sorafenib and Y90 Radioembolization alone in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Bargellini, Irene
    Cela, Marina
    Cincione, Ivan
    Sacco, Rodolfo
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [8] Y90 Radioembolization Dosimetry: Concepts for the Interventional Radiologist
    Toskich, Beau Bosko
    Liu, David M.
    TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 22 (02) : 100 - 111
  • [9] Clinical Outcomes of Y90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Romano, K.
    Emery, A.
    Trifiletti, D. M.
    Huber, T.
    Contrella, B.
    Janowski, E. M.
    Read, P. W.
    Showalter, T. N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E182 - E182
  • [10] EFFICACY OF YTTRIUM90 ( Y90) RADIOEMBOLIZATION FOR DOWNSTAGING OR BRIDGE TO TRANSPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
    Ghattu, Meghana
    Engstrom, Bjorn
    Castro-Pearson, Sandra
    Lake, John R.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 78 : S1838 - S1839