Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

被引:2
|
作者
Browne, Robert [1 ]
McAnena, Peter [1 ]
O'Halloran, Niamh [2 ]
Moloney, Brian M. [2 ]
Crilly, Emily [1 ]
Kerin, Michael J. [1 ,3 ]
Lowery, Aoife J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Galway, Dept Surg, Galway, Ireland
[2] Univ Hosp Galway, Dept Radiol, Galway, Ireland
[3] Natl Univ Ireland Galway, Lambe Inst Translat Res, Discipline Surg, Galway, Ireland
关键词
Breast cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; MRI; grade; pathology; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; RESIDUAL TUMOR SIZE; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; SYSTEMIC TREATMENT; CANCER PATIENTS; MRI; THERAPY; SUBTYPES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1177/11782234221103504
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: The ability to accurately predict pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer would improve patient selection for specific treatment strategies, would provide important information for patients to aid in the treatment selection process, and could potentially avoid the need for more extensive surgery. The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting pCR has previously been studied, with mixed results. Magnetic resonance imaging performance may also be influenced by tumour and patient factors. METHODS: Eighty-seven breast cancer patients who underwent NAC were studied. Pre-NAC and post-NAC MRI findings were compared with pathologic findings postsurgical excision. The impact of patient and tumour characteristics on MRI accuracy was evaluated. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of participants was 48.7 (10.3) years. The rate of pCR based on post-NAC MRI was 19.5% overall (19/87). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and accuracy in predicting pCR were 52.9%, 77.1%, 36.0%, 87.1%, and 72.4%, respectively. Positive predictive value was the highest in nonluminal versus Luminal A disease (45.0% vs 25.0%, P < .001), with higher rates of false positivity in nonluminal subtypes (P = .002). Tumour grade, T category, and histological subtype were all independent predictors of MRI accuracy regarding post-NAC tumour size. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging alone is insufficient to accurately predict pCR in breast cancer patients post-NAC. Magnetic resonance imaging predictions of pCR are more accurate in nonluminal subtypes. Tumour grade, T category, and histological subtype should be considered when evaluating post-NAC tumour sizes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response rates in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Karanlik, H.
    Saip, P.
    Fayda, M.
    Yavuz, E.
    Eralp, Y.
    Kucucuk, S.
    Kurul, S.
    Aydiner, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S154 - S154
  • [2] Magnetic Resonance Imaging to predict pathological response neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Lamot, C.
    Van fraeyenhove, F.
    Denys, H.
    Van Herreweghe, E.
    Van den Broecke, R.
    Villeirs, G.
    Depypere, H.
    Praet, M.
    Cocquyt, V.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 6 (07): : 60 - 61
  • [3] Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Pasquero, Giorgia
    Surace, Alessandra
    Ponti, Antonio
    Bortolini, Massimiliano
    Tota, Donatella
    Mano, Maria Piera
    Arisio, Riccardo
    Benedetto, Chiara
    Bau, Maria Grazia
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (02): : 909 - 915
  • [4] Dynamic Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Pretreatment Prediction of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    He Dongfeng
    Ma Daqing
    Jin Erhu
    [J]. CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2012, 12 (02) : 94 - 101
  • [5] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Pathological Response in Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Gülçin Akkavak Palazalı
    Ravza Yılmaz
    Ozgkıour Palazalı
    Memduh Dursun
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2023, 85 : 39 - 44
  • [6] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Pathological Response in Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Akkavak Palazali, Gulcin
    Yilmaz, Ravza
    Palazali, Ozgkiour
    Dursun, Memduh
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 85 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [7] A Noninvasive Tool Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics for the Preoperative Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Chenchen Li
    Nian Lu
    Zifan He
    Yujie Tan
    Yajing Liu
    Yongjian Chen
    Zhuo Wu
    Jingwen Liu
    Wei Ren
    Luhui Mao
    Yunfang Yu
    Chuanmiao Xie
    Herui Yao
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 7685 - 7693
  • [8] A Noninvasive Tool Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics for the Preoperative Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
    Li, Chenchen
    Lu, Nian
    He, Zifan
    Tan, Yujie
    Liu, Yajing
    Chen, Yongjian
    Wu, Zhuo
    Liu, Jingwen
    Ren, Wei
    Mao, Luhui
    Yu, Yunfang
    Xie, Chuanmiao
    Yao, Herui
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (12) : 7685 - 7693
  • [9] Relevance of breast cancer subtypes for magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring during neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Cesar Gómez-Raposo
    Mónica Andreu
    Inés Suárez-García
    M. Isabel Esteban
    Mar Carballo
    María F. Sereno-Moyano
    José L. Vázquez Osorio
    Javier Heras
    Francisco Zambrana Tévar
    Eva Pelayo
    Miriam López-Gómez
    Clara García de Santiago
    María Merino Salvador
    Enrique Casado
    [J]. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2012, 14 : 486 - 488
  • [10] Relevance of breast cancer subtypes for magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring during neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Gomez-Raposo, Cesar
    Andreu, Monica
    Suarez-Garcia, Ines
    Isabel Esteban, M.
    Carballo, Mar
    Sereno-Moyano, Maria F.
    Vazquez Osorio, Jose L.
    Heras, Javier
    Zambrana Tevar, Francisco
    Pelayo, Eva
    Lopez-Gomez, Miriam
    Garcia de Santiago, Clara
    Merino Salvador, Maria
    Casado, Enrique
    [J]. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 (06): : 486 - 488