Querying stakeholders to inform comparative effectiveness research

被引:1
|
作者
Hong, Yoon Duk [1 ]
Goto, Daisuke [1 ]
Mullins, C. Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Pharm, Pharmaceut Hlth Serv Res Dept, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
comparative effectiveness research; stakeholder engagement; stakeholder views; CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH; CONTINUOUS PATIENT ENGAGEMENT; HEALTH-CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; RESEARCH-INSTITUTE; INVOLVEMENT; POLICY; PERSPECTIVE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.2217/cer-2016-0082
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the growing recognition of the value of stakeholder engagement in research, there is limited guidance on effectively eliciting stakeholder views during the comparative effectiveness research (CER) process. This article outlines the potential role of each stakeholder (patient, provider, policymaker and payer) throughout the CER process and provides examples of practical questions that researchers can ask the four primary stakeholder groups at each step of the CER process. This guide aims to assist in the development of meaningful stakeholder-researcher shared decisionmaking to incorporate stakeholder views in the design, conduct and dissemination of patient-centered CER.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research
    Shah, Bimal R.
    Drozda, Joseph
    Peterson, Eric D.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 160 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [2] THE STATE OF THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (CER) ENVIRONMENT: SURVEYS OF STAKEHOLDERS AND INFLUENTIALS
    Westrich, K. D.
    Schur, C.
    Adams, A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A23 - A23
  • [3] Comparative Effectiveness Research to Inform Medical Decisions: The Need for Common Language
    Meropol, Neal J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (34) : 4192 - 4193
  • [4] Patients and clinicians as stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: multiple perspectives and evolving roles
    Williams, Sunyna S.
    Esposito, Dominick
    Rich, Eugene C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2014, 3 (06) : 573 - 575
  • [5] Using Comparative Effectiveness Research to Inform Policy and Practice in the UK NHSPast, Present and Future
    Kalipso Chalkidou
    Tom Walley
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2010, 28 : 799 - 811
  • [6] Using comparative effectiveness research to inform decision-making: is there a role of economic evaluation?
    Callahan, Kyle P.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (04) : 299 - 301
  • [7] A COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS INDEX TO INFORM CLINICAL DECISIONS
    Horowicz-Mehler, N.
    Doyle, J.
    Arikian, S.
    Hagan, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A10 - A10
  • [8] The impact of comparative effectiveness research: stakeholders' views on what will improve healthcare decision-making
    Westrich, Kimberly D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (04) : 325 - 327
  • [9] Using Comparative Effectiveness Research to Inform Policy and Practice in the UK NHS Past, Present and Future
    Chalkidou, Kalipso
    Walley, Tom
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (10) : 799 - 811
  • [10] Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: A patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care
    Schmittdiel, Julie A.
    Desai, Jay
    Schroeder, Emily B.
    Paolino, Andrea R.
    Nichols, Gregory A.
    Lawrence, Jean M.
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Ohnsorg, Kris A.
    Newton, Katherine M.
    Steiner, John F.
    [J]. HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION, 2015, 3 (02): : 80 - 88