Cost-benefit analysis of seismic-isolated structures with viscous damper based on loss estimation

被引:16
|
作者
Banazadeh, Mehdi [1 ]
Gholhaki, Majid [2 ]
Sani, Hossein Parvini [2 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tehran Polytech, Tehran, Iran
[2] Semnan Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Semnan, Iran
关键词
Seismic performance; seismic isolation; viscous fluid dampers; loss estimation; cost-benefit analysis; performance-based seismic design; RESPONSE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; STRENGTH; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1080/15732479.2016.1236131
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents a methodology to utilise performance-based seismic design procedure for evaluating isolated structures with or without viscous dampers (VD) considering cost-benefit analysis. A non-linear four-story archetype of conventional steel structure, a lead-rubber-bearing isolated structure and a natural rubber-bearing isolated structure with the linear VD are compared with each other under far-field (FF) and near-field (NF) ground motions. Also, loss parameters, such as expected annualised loss, expected annualised repair time, expected annualised fatalities and expected annualised injuries based on loss estimation process, are utilised for evaluating the structures. Sensitivity analysis is used to study the effect of modelling uncertainty variations in the loss estimation process. It has been found that the effectivity of supplemental damping for low damping isolated structures increases in the NF comparing with the FF ground motions. Finally, the cost-benefit analysis is done to calculate payback period of investment for additional cost of the isolation system with or without the supplemental damping. The advantage of loss estimation is an improved method to evaluate the effectiveness of the isolation system in terms of loss parameters that are useful in the cost-benefit studies and for determining rational insurance premiums.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1055
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of the seismic-isolated connected structures for MOMA
    Xu, Ziguo
    Xiao, Congzhen
    Liao, Yubiao
    Zhang, Liruo
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 41 (03): : 53 - 57
  • [2] The optimal TADAS damper placement in moment resisting steel structures based on a cost-benefit analysis
    Yousefzadeh, A.
    Sebt, M. H.
    Tehranizadeh, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, 9 (01) : 23 - 32
  • [3] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR SEISMIC REABILITATION OF BUILDINGS
    Salvado, Filipa
    Joao Falcao Silva, M.
    M2D2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MATERIALS IN DESIGN, 2015, : 1411 - 1412
  • [4] Lifecycle cost-benefit analysis of isolated buildings
    Goda, K.
    Lee, C. S.
    Hong, H. P.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2010, 32 (01) : 52 - 63
  • [5] Seismic retrofit options for non-structural building partition walls: Impact on loss estimation and cost-benefit analysis
    Sousa, Luis
    Monteiro, Ricardo
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 161 : 8 - 27
  • [6] Cost-benefit analysis for heightening of existing levee structures based on reliability
    Gao, YH
    Zhang, JZ
    Sun, DY
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FOR YOUNG EXPERTS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 1095 - 1101
  • [7] Seismic performance of building structures based on improved viscous damper seismic design
    Guo, Yingfei
    Wang, Sen
    Zhang, Shuyuan
    JOURNAL OF VIBROENGINEERING, 2024, 26 (05) : 1082 - 1100
  • [8] Cost-benefit analysis for the optimal rehabilitation of deteriorating structures
    Higuchi, S.
    Macke, M.
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (04) : 291 - 306
  • [9] Cost-benefit analysis of maintenance interventions for deteriorating structures
    Higuchi, Shoko
    Macke, Michael
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2007, : 141 - 142
  • [10] Ecological Compensation Estimation of Soil and Water Conservation Based on Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Sun, Lina
    Lu, Wenxi
    Yang, Qingchun
    Delgado Martin, Jordi
    Li, Di
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (08) : 2709 - 2727