Harmonisation of European tests for serological diagnosis of Brucella infection in bovines

被引:11
|
作者
McGiven, J. A. [1 ]
Stack, J. A. [1 ]
Perrett, L. L. [1 ]
Tucker, J. D. [1 ]
Brew, S. D. [1 ]
Stubberfield, E. [1 ]
MacMillan, A. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vet Labs Agcy, OIE, FAO,Dept Bacterial Dis, WHO Collaborating Ctr Reference & Res Brucellosis, Weybridge KT15 3NB, Surrey, England
关键词
Brucella; complement fixation test; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; harmonisation; ring trial; Rose-Bengal test; serum agglutination test;
D O I
10.20506/rst.25.3.1714
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The principal methods for the serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis are the complement fixation test (CFT), serum agglutination test (SAT), Rose-Bengal test (RBT), indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) and more recently the competitive ELISA (cELISA) and the fluorescent polarisation assay (FPA). Guidelines set by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) describe methods and diagnostic thresholds for each of these tests. Many countries have adopted these methods for the purposes of eradication of brucellosis and have legislated for the use of these tests (the CFT and SAT in particular) for the prevention of the spread of the disease through international trade. Within the European Union (EU) each member state has a National Reference Laboratory which regulates the quality of brucellosis diagnosis and works to the recommendations set by the OIE. This article describes the results from the first three EU ring trials assessing the harmonisation of diagnostic tests between each member state. The general level of harmony for SAT, CFT, and iELISA was found to be good, but issues of standardisation of the RBT, cELISA and FPA remain. The cELISA and FPA in particular need further work to create European harmony. The ring trials also proved successful at providing specific evidence of poor performance in some areas. The decision on whether or not to take action on the basis of these results rested with the individual laboratories concerned. The increase in the number of participants in these trials overtime reflected the enlargement of the EU and increased the need for quality assurance.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1053
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS INFECTION OF GOATS
    DIAZAPARICIO, E
    MARIN, C
    ALONSOURMENETA, B
    ARAGON, V
    PEREZORTIZ, S
    PARDO, M
    BLASCO, JM
    DIAZ, R
    MORIYON, I
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (05) : 1159 - 1165
  • [2] A SURVEY OF BRUCELLA INFECTION OF CATTLE IN KENYA - A COMPARISON OF 4 SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTION
    NAGY, LK
    SORHEIM, AO
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1969, 84 (03) : 65 - +
  • [3] Comparison of three serological tests in the diagnosis of Brucella infection in unvaccinated cattle in Eritrea
    Omer, MK
    Skjerve, E
    MacMillan, AP
    Woldehiwet, Z
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2001, 48 (03) : 215 - 222
  • [4] INTRADERMAL TEST AND SEROLOGICAL TESTS IN SUSPECTED BRUCELLA INFECTION IN MAN
    BRADSTREET, CM
    TANNAHILL, AJ
    POLLOCK, TM
    MOGFORD, HE
    LANCET, 1970, 2 (7674): : 653 - +
  • [5] COMPARISON OF SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS INFECTION IN SHEEP
    MAHAJAN, NK
    KULSHRESHTHA, RC
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 1991, 23 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [6] Comparison and standardisation of serological methods for the diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in bovines
    von Blumröder, D
    Schares, G
    Norton, R
    Williams, DJL
    Esteban-Redondo, I
    Wright, S
    Björkman, C
    Frössling, J
    Risco-Castillo, V
    Fernández-García, A
    Ortega-Mora, LM
    Sager, H
    Hemphill, A
    van Maanen, C
    Wouda, W
    Conraths, FJ
    VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2004, 120 (1-2) : 11 - 22
  • [7] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLA-OVIS INFECTION
    COX, JC
    GORRIE, CJR
    NAIRN, RC
    WARD, HA
    BRITISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1977, 133 (05): : 442 - 445
  • [8] Enhanced diagnostic accuracy of combined serological and bacteriological tests for brucella infection
    Yan, Tielun
    Jia, Haoyuan
    Xie, Hejie
    Wu, Qiulin
    Chen, Weifeng
    Wu, Lingbin
    Lian, Dong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 16 (08): : 3915 - 3921
  • [9] A comparison between three serological tests for Brucella melitensis infection in sheep
    Abuharfeil, N
    Abo-Shehada, MN
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1998, 22 (02): : 119 - 122
  • [10] Evaluation of tests employed in serological diagnosis of brucellosis caused by Brucella ovis
    Cerri, D
    Ebani, VV
    Pedrini, A
    Bassi, S
    Bey, RF
    Andreani, E
    Farina, R
    MICROBIOLOGICA, 2000, 23 (03): : 281 - 288