Natural rubber latex: Glove use, sensitization, and airborne and latent dust concentrations at a Denver Hospital

被引:27
|
作者
Page, EH
Esswein, EJ
Petersen, MR
Lewis, DM
Bledsoe, TA
机构
[1] NIOSH, Epidem Intelligence Serv, Cincinnati, OH 45226 USA
[2] NIOSH, Div Surveillance Hazard Evaluat & Field Studies, Cincinnati, OH 45226 USA
[3] NIOSH, Hlth Effects Lab Div, Cincinnati, OH 45226 USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Epidemiol Program Off, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00043764-200006000-00010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Exposure to natural rubber latex may cause immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Published latex sensitization prevalence rates range from 2.9% to 22% among health care workers, and from 0.12% to about 20% of occupationally unexposed populations. In this study, self-administered questionnaires addressed job and personal characteristics, glove use, and symptoms in two groups of hospital workers: those who regularly used Inter gloves and those who did not. Serum was tested for latex-specific immunoglobulin E. Air, surface, and air-filter dust samples for natural rubber Inter were collected. The prevalence of Inter sensitization was 6.3% in the non-users and 6.1% in the latex glove users (P = 0.9); 81.3% of sensitized workers were atopic compared with 59.5% of non-sensitized workers (P < 0.05). Reporting of work-related hand dermatitis was more common in the latex glove users (23.4%) than in the non-users (4.9%), as were rhino-conjunctivitis (16.3% and 7.9%, respectively, [P < 0.01]), and hand urticaria (9.9% and 2.1%, respectively, [P < 0.01]). There was no significant difference in work-related symptoms between the sensitized and non-sensitized workers. Environmental concentrations of latex were higher in the work areas of the non-sensitized workers, but higher in the clinical than in the non-clinical areas. Occupational latex glove use was not a risk factor for sensitization.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 620
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条