Reliable assessment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline variants by next-generation sequencing: a multicenter study

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Rui [1 ,3 ]
Gao, Peng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Han, Yanxi [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Runling [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tan, Ping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Li [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jiawei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Jiehong [1 ,3 ]
Li, Jinming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing Hosp, Natl Ctr Clin Labs, Natl Ctr Gerontol,Inst Geriatr Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll, Grad Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Hosp, Beijing Engn Res Ctr Lab Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
BRCA1; 2; Next-generation sequencing; Germline variant; Variant interpretation; BREAST-CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION; MUTATIONS; STANDARDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-020-01204-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background BRCA1/2 gene mutation testing, based on next-generation sequencing (NGS), has been gradually applied in the clinic to serve as preventive early screening for predisposed individuals or to provide treatment options for patients with hereditary breast or ovarian cancers. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of NGS-based mutation detection in BRCA1/2 and the consistency in variant interpretation among clinical laboratories to find the possible reasons underlying inaccurate results and discrepant variant interpretation. Methods Laboratories were asked to use their routine procedures to detect six mimetic DNA samples with different BRCA1/2 germline variants. The results of variant detection were required to be submitted via a web-based evaluation system and were automatically scored, according to predefined criteria. The variant interpretation report, including the detailed clinical evidence, was summarized and analyzed for reasons underlying inconsistent results. Results Overall, only 55.2% (16/29) of laboratories, whose detection score was higher than 90 points, was found to be an acceptable detection capability level. 82.9% (29/35) of the errors were genotype errors. The variant classification results were generally consistent, and 77.8% (7/9) of the variants were given the consistent classification answer. Only two single nucleotide variants (SNVs) had a discrepant classification opinion across laboratories. Conclusions The BRCA1/2 variant detection performance should be further improved, especially in reporting the correct genome coordinates. Inconsistent variant classification may be a result of the different clinical pieces of evidence collected by the laboratories. However, discordant clinical evidence also appeared within the same classification results. Therefore, our study provided clear clinical evidence assessment strategies for BRCA1/2 variants, which was aimed at obtaining a consistent variant classification strategy for providing accurate clinical reports to the clinicians.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 683
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliable assessment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline variants by next-generation sequencing: a multicenter study
    Rui Zhang
    Peng Gao
    Yanxi Han
    Runling Zhang
    Ping Tan
    Li Zhou
    Jiawei Zhang
    Jiehong Xie
    Jinming Li
    [J]. Breast Cancer, 2021, 28 : 672 - 683
  • [2] A Clinically-Validated Next-Generation Sequencing Diagnostic Platform for Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants Detected
    Qu, A.
    Eskdale, J.
    Davis, C.
    Do, T.
    Shurshalina, A.
    Muhammad, U.
    Pascual, C.
    Cohen, J.
    Mordechai, E.
    Adelson, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2014, 16 (06): : 709 - 709
  • [3] Detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Japanese population using next-generation sequencing
    Hirotsu, Yosuke
    Nakagomi, Hiroshi
    Sakamoto, Ikuko
    Amemiya, Kenji
    Mochizuki, Hitoshi
    Omata, Masao
    [J]. MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (02): : 121 - 129
  • [4] Development and Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants for the Clinical Laboratory
    Strom, Charles M.
    Rivera, Steven
    Elzinga, Christopher
    Angeloni, Taraneh
    Rosenthal, Sun Hee
    Goos-Root, Dana
    Siaw, Martin
    Platt, Jamie
    Braastadt, Cory
    Cheng, Linda
    Ross, David
    Sun, Weimin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [5] Evaluation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Detection
    Capone, Gabriele Lorenzo
    Putignano, Anna Laura
    Saavedra, Sharon Trujillo
    Paganini, Irene
    Sestini, Roberta
    Gensini, Francesca
    De Rienzo, Irene
    Papi, Laura
    Porfirio, Berardino
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2018, 20 (01): : 87 - 94
  • [6] Evaluation of an amplicon-based next-generation sequencing panel for detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic variants
    Shin, Saeam
    Hwang, In Sik
    Lee, Seung-Tae
    Choi, Jong Rak
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 158 (03) : 433 - 440
  • [7] Next-generation sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer patients and control subjects
    Balabanski, Lubomir
    Antov, Georgi
    Dimova, Ivanka
    Ivanov, Samuil
    Nacheva, Maria
    Gavrilov, Ivan
    Nesheva, Desislava
    Rukova, Blaga
    Hadjidekova, Savina
    Malinov, Maxim
    Toncheva, Draga
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 2 (03) : 435 - 439
  • [8] Evaluation of an amplicon-based next-generation sequencing panel for detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic variants
    Saeam Shin
    In Sik Hwang
    Seung-Tae Lee
    Jong Rak Choi
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 158 : 433 - 440
  • [9] The molecular analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: Next-generation sequencing supersedes conventional approaches
    D'Argenio, Valeria
    Esposito, Maria Valeria
    Telese, Antonella
    Precone, Vincenza
    Starnone, Flavio
    Nunziato, Marcella
    Cantiello, Piergiuseppe
    Iorio, Mariangela
    Evangelista, Eloisa
    D'Aiuto, Massimiliano
    Calabrese, Alessandra
    Frisso, Giulia
    D'Aiuto, Giuseppe
    Salvatore, Francesco
    [J]. CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2015, 446 : 221 - 225
  • [10] Comparison of Targeted Next-Generation and Sanger Sequencing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Screening
    Park, Joonhong
    Jang, Woori
    Chae, Hyojin
    Kim, Yonggoo
    Chi, Hyun Young
    Kim, Myungshin
    [J]. ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 36 (02) : 197 - 201