Tradition, φρονησισ and Practical Philosophy On Gadamer's Critical Inclusion of Heidegger

In contrast to Heidegger's strong ontological interest, Gadamer conceptualises hermeneutics as practical philosophy. Following Heidegger, Gadamer pays much attention to Aristotle's notion of phi rho omicron nu eta sigma iota sigma and its difference from tau epsilon chi nu eta Nonetheless, Gadamer distances himself from his teacher in the sense that it emphasises sigma upsilon nu epsilon sigma iota sigma and eta theta omicron sigma, which Heidegger did not do. Here lies the characteristical development of a methodology which transforms Heidegger's formal approach into a historical. Thanks to that, Gadamer can go down a path of practical philosophy different from that of Heidegger, which ensures the pre-theoretical character of philosophy, something that Heidegger demanded. Gadamer's critical inclusion of Heidegger becomes fulfilled, and it reflects the meaning of Heidegger's ontological approach in our time.