Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension

被引:75
|
作者
Wendt, Dorothea [1 ,2 ]
Dau, Torsten [1 ]
Hjortkjaer, Jens [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Elect Engn, Hearing Syst, Hearing Syst Grp, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Eriksholm Res Ctr, Snekkersten, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Danish Res Ctr Magnet Resonance, Ctr Funct & Diagnost Imaging & Res, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2016年 / 7卷
关键词
effort; processing demands; pupillometry; syntactic complexity; background noise; working memory capacity; reading span; digit span; SPEECH-RECEPTION THRESHOLD; LISTENING EFFORT; PUPILLARY RESPONSES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; OLDER-ADULTS; FLUCTUATING NOISE; WORKING-MEMORY; HEARING-LOSS; INTELLIGIBILITY; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00345
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Speech comprehension in adverse listening conditions can be effortful even when speech is fully intelligible. Acoustical distortions typically make speech comprehension more effortful, but effort also depends on linguistic aspects of the speech signal, such as its syntactic complexity. In the present study, pupil dilations, and subjective effort ratings were recorded in 20 normal-hearing participants while performing a sentence comprehension task. The sentences were either syntactically simple (subject first sentence structure) or complex (object-first sentence structure) and were presented in two levels of background noise both corresponding to high intelligibility. A digit span and a reading span test were used to assess individual differences in the participants' working memory capacity (WMC). The results showed that the subjectively rated effort was mostly affected by the noise level and less by syntactic complexity. Conversely, pupil dilations increased with syntactic complexity but only showed a small effect of the noise level. Participants with higher WMC showed increased pupil responses in the higher-level noise condition but rated sentence comprehension as being less effortful compared to participants with lower WMC. Overall, the results demonstrate that pupil dilations and subjectively rated effort represent different aspects of effort. Furthermore, the results indicate that effort can vary in situations with high speech intelligibility.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VERB PROCESSING DURING SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN APHASIA
    SHAPIRO, LP
    LEVINE, BA
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1990, 38 (01) : 21 - 47
  • [2] PROCESSING PRENOMINAL ADJECTIVES DURING SENTENCE COMPREHENSION
    Kennison, Shelia M.
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2010, 111 (01) : 141 - 157
  • [3] COGNITIVE PROCESSING IN SENTENCE COMPREHENSION
    ISAKSON, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1979, 72 (03): : 160 - 165
  • [4] PROCESSING STRATEGIES IN SENTENCE COMPREHENSION
    WANNEMACHER, JT
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1976, 4 (NA1) : 48 - 52
  • [5] Direct impact of cognitive control on sentence processing and comprehension
    Hsu, Nina S.
    Kuchinsky, Stefanie E.
    Novick, Jared M.
    [J]. LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 36 (02) : 211 - 239
  • [6] LEXICAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING DURING SENTENCE COMPREHENSION
    CAIRNS, HS
    KAMERMAN, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1975, 14 (02): : 170 - 179
  • [7] IDIOM COMPREHENSION DURING SENTENCE PROCESSING IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISM
    Walenski, Matthew
    Heldreth, Ashlee
    Hubbell, Stephanie
    McCabe, Connor
    Love, Tracy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, : 108 - 108
  • [8] VERB PROCESSING DURING SENTENCE COMPREHENSION - CONTEXTUAL IMPENETRABILITY
    SHAPIRO, LP
    ZURIF, EB
    GRIMSHAW, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1989, 18 (02) : 223 - 243
  • [9] Effect of syntactic complexity and signal-to-noise condition on sentence comprehension
    Dillon, LM
    PichoraFuller, MK
    Gilbert, JHV
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 4183 - 4183
  • [10] PARTICIPANT ROLES AND THE PROCESSING OF VERBS DURING SENTENCE COMPREHENSION
    AHRENS, K
    SWINNEY, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1995, 24 (06) : 533 - 547