Differentiating Between Adductor and Abductor Spasmodic Dysphonia Using Airflow Interruption

被引:11
|
作者
Hoffman, Matthew R. [1 ]
Jiang, Jack J. [1 ]
Rieves, Adam L. [1 ]
McElveen, Kelsey A. B. [1 ]
Ford, Charles N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Madison, WI USA
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2009年 / 119卷 / 09期
关键词
Spasmodic dysphonia; laryngeal resistance; airflow interruption; mean flow rate; subglottal pressure; BOTULINUM TOXIN; SUBGLOTTAL PRESSURE; LARYNGEAL DYSTONIA; SPASTIC DYSPHONIA; VOICE DISORDERS; VIDEOSTROBOSCOPY; INJECTIONS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1002/lary.20572
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis: To measure the laryngeal resistance (R-L), subglottal pressure (P-S), and mean flow rate (MFR) of adductor (ADSD) and abductor (ABSD) spasmodic dysphonia patients using the airflow interrupter. Methods: The R-L of six ABSD and seven ADSD patients was measured using the airflow interrupter, a noninvasive device designed to measure MFR and P-S via mechanical balloon valve interruption. Subjects performed 10 trials at each of two intensity levels, with each trial consisting of a sustained /a/ during which phonation was interrupted for 500 ms. Laryngeal resistance was calculated as subglottal pressure divided by airflow. Results: Mean RL for the ADSD and ABSD subtypes at 65 dB were 24.78 cmH(2)O/L/s and 14.51 cmH(2)O/L/s, respectively (P = .04). Mean R-L at 70 dB were 40.02 cmH(2)O/L/s and 15.84 cmH(2)O/L/s (P = .014). P-S for the ADSD and ABSD subtypes at 65 dB were 10.23 cmH(2)O and 8.32 cmH(2)O, respectively (P = .582). At the 70 dB level, P-S were 12.39 cmH(2)O and 11.78 cmH(2)O (P = .886). MFR for the ADSD and ABSD subtypes at 65 dB were 435 mL/s and 746 mL/s (P = .205). Mean MFR at 70 dB were 518 mL/s and 848 mL/s (P = .198). Conclusions: Noninvasive measurements of RL may be useful for differentiating between ADSD and ABSD. This simple objective test, which produces a quantitative output, could be used to evaluate laryngeal function in patients with spasmodic dysphonia.
引用
收藏
页码:1851 / 1855
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adductor muscle activity abnormalities in abductor spasmodic dysphonia
    Cyrus, CB
    Bielamowicz, S
    Evans, FJ
    Ludlow, CL
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2001, 124 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [2] LARYNGEAL ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ACTIVITY IN ADDUCTOR AND ABDUCTOR SPASMODIC DYSPHONIA
    WATSON, BC
    SCHAEFER, SD
    FREEMAN, FJ
    DEMBOWSKI, J
    KONDRASKE, G
    ROARK, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1991, 34 (03): : 473 - 482
  • [3] Effects of adductor muscle stimulation on speech in abductor spasmodic dysphonia
    Bidus, KA
    Thomas, GR
    Ludlow, CL
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2000, 110 (11): : 1943 - 1949
  • [4] Abductor Paralysis After Botox Injection for Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia
    Venkatesan, Naren N.
    Johns, Michael M.
    Hapner, Edie R.
    DelGaudio, John M.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2010, 120 (06): : 1177 - 1180
  • [5] COMPARISON OF MUSCLE ACTIVATION PATTERNS IN ADDUCTOR AND ABDUCTOR SPASMODIC DYSPHONIA
    VANPELT, F
    LUDLOW, CL
    SMITH, PJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1994, 103 (03): : 192 - 200
  • [6] Glottic physiology after Botox treatment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia, abductor spasmodic dysphonia and vocal tremor
    Izdebski, K
    Ward, RR
    [J]. VOICE UPDATE, 1996, 97 : 131 - 146
  • [7] Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia
    Nawka, Tadeus
    [J]. SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2019, 43 (04): : 173 - 174
  • [8] Influence of Consonant Voicing Characteristics on Sentence Production in Abductor Versus Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia
    Cannito, Michael P.
    Chorna, Lesya B.
    Kahane, Joel C.
    Dworkin, James P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2014, 28 (03) : 394.e13 - 394.e22
  • [9] Spasmodic Dysphonia of the Abductor-Type
    Ptok, Martin
    [J]. SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2016, 40 (02): : 57 - 57
  • [10] THE TREATMENT OF ADDUCTOR SPASMODIC DYSPHONIA USING BOTULINUM TOXIN
    WHURR, R
    FONTANA, H
    LORCH, M
    BROOKES, G
    LEES, A
    [J]. FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1992, 44 (1-2): : 90 - 91