Utility of Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) Trial: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial

被引:7
|
作者
Weindelmayer, J. [1 ]
Mengardo, V. [1 ]
Veltri, A. [1 ]
Baiocchi, G. L. [2 ]
Giacopuzzi, S. [1 ]
Verlato, G. [3 ]
de Manzoni, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Osped Univ Integrata, Gen & Upper GI Surg Div, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, I-37126 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Brescia, Dept Clin & Expt Sci, Brescia, Italy
[3] Univ Verona, Dept Diagnost & Publ Hlth, Verona, Italy
关键词
Gastric cancer; Gastrectomy; Abdominal drain; Drainage; Randomized controlled trial; GASTRIC-CANCER; RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; RECURRENCE; PLACEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-021-05102-1
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundProphylactic use of abdominal drain in gastrectomy has been questioned in the last 15years, and a 2015 Cochrane meta-analysis on four RCTs concluded that there was no convincing evidence to the routine drain placement in gastrectomy. Nevertheless, the authors evidenced the moderate/low quality of the included studies and highlighted how 3 out of 4 came from Eastern countries. After 2015, only retrospective studies have been published, all with inconsistent results.MethodsADiGe (Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy) Trial is a multicenter prospective randomized non-inferiority trial with a parallel design. It aimed to verify whether avoiding routine use of abdominal drain is burdened with complications, particularly an increase in postoperative invasive procedures. Patients with gastric cancer, scheduled for subtotal or total gastrectomy with curative intent, are eligible for inclusion, irrespective of previous oncological treatment.The primary composite endpoint is reoperation or percutaneous drainage procedures within 30 postoperative days. The primary analysis will verify whether the incidence of the primary composite endpoint is higher in the experimental arm, avoiding routine drain placement, than control arm, undergoing prophylactic drain placement, in order to falsify or support the null hypothesis of inferiority. Secondary endpoints assessed for superiority are overall morbidity and mortality, Comprehensive Complications Index, incidence and time for diagnosis of anastomotic and duodenal leaks, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate.Assuming one-sided alpha of 5%, and cumulative incidence of the primary composite endpoint of 6.4% in the control arm and 4.2% in the experimental one, 364 patients allow to achieve 80% power to detect a non-inferiority margin difference between the arm proportions of 3.6%. Considering a 10% drop-out rate, 404 patients are needed. In order to have a balanced percentage between total and subtotal gastrectomy, recruitment will end at 202 patients for each type of gastrectomy. The surgeon and the patient are blinded until the end of the operation, while postoperative course is not blinded to the patient and caregivers.DiscussionADiGe Trial could contribute to critically re-evaluate the role of prophylactic drain in gastrectomy, a still widely used procedure.Trial registrationProspectively registered (last updated on 29 October 2020) at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT04227951.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utility of Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) Trial: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial
    J. Weindelmayer
    V. Mengardo
    A. Veltri
    G. L. Baiocchi
    S. Giacopuzzi
    G. Verlato
    G. de Manzoni
    [J]. Trials, 22
  • [2] Is this a non-inferiority trial?
    O'Halloran, Peter
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 202 (02) : 154 - 154
  • [3] The impact of an inappropriate non-inferiority margin in a non-inferiority trial
    Gupta, Reena
    Gupta, Himanshu
    Banker, Manish
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (12) : 2892 - 2893
  • [4] A brief intervention for PTSD versus treatment as usual: Study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
    Stavland, Halvor
    Refvik, Camilla
    Eid, Jarle
    Lockhat, Rafiq
    Hammar, Asa
    [J]. TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [5] IVF and IUI in couples with unexplained infertility (FIIX study): study protocol of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
    Prentice, Lucy
    Sadler, Lynn
    Lensen, Sarah
    Vercoe, Melissa
    Wilkinson, Jack
    Edlin, Richard
    Chambers, Georgina M.
    Farquhar, Cynthia M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2020, 2020 (03)
  • [6] What is a non-inferiority trial?
    Sedgwick, Philip
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
  • [7] The YOMEGA non-inferiority trial
    El Fara, Hicham
    [J]. LANCET, 2019, 394 (10207): : 1411 - 1411
  • [8] Remimazolam tosilate in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, phase III trial
    Chen, Shao-Hui
    Yuan, Tang-Mi
    Zhang, Jiao
    Bai, Hua
    Tian, Ming
    Pan, Chu-Xiong
    Bao, Hong-Guang
    Jin, Xiao-Ju
    Ji, Fu-Hai
    Zhong, Tai-Di
    Wang, Qiang
    Lv, Jian-Rui
    Wang, Sheng
    Li, Yu-Juan
    Yu, Yong-Hao
    Luo, Ai-Lin
    Li, Xiang-Kui
    Min, Su
    Li, Lin
    Zou, Xiao-Hua
    Huang, Yu-Guang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (02) : 474 - 481
  • [9] Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
    Jin, Jiabin
    Shi, Yusheng
    Chen, Mengmin
    Qian, Jianfeng
    Qin, Kai
    Wang, Zhen
    Chen, Wei
    Jin, Weiwei
    Lu, Fengchun
    Li, Zheyong
    Wu, Zehua
    Jian, Li
    Han, Bing
    Liang, Xiao
    Sun, Chuandong
    Wu, Zheng
    Mou, Yiping
    Yin, Xiaoyu
    Huang, Heguang
    Chen, Hao
    Gemenetzis, Georgios
    Deng, Xiaxing
    Peng, Chenghong
    Shen, Baiyong
    [J]. TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [10] Reply: The impact of an inappropriate non-inferiority margin in a non-inferiority trial
    Groenewoud, Eva
    Kollen, Boudewijn
    Macklon, Nick
    Cohlen, Ben
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (12) : 2893 - 2893