Downsides of face masks and possible mitigation strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:49
|
作者
Bakhit, Mina [1 ]
Krzyzaniak, Natalia [1 ]
Scott, Anna Mae [1 ]
Clark, Justin [1 ]
Glasziou, Paul [1 ]
Del Mar, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Bond Univ, Inst Evidence Based Healthcare, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 02期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
public health; COVID-19; health policy; HEALTH-CARE WORKERS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PREVENT INFLUENZA TRANSMISSION; N95; RESPIRATORS; MEDICAL MASKS; NONPHARMACEUTICAL INTERVENTIONS; BREATHING RESISTANCE; SUBJECTIVE RESPONSES; CLINICAL-TRIAL; HAND HYGIENE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044364
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo identify, appraise and synthesise studies evaluating the downsides of wearing face masks in any setting. We also discuss potential strategies to mitigate these downsides.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and EuropePMC were searched (inception-18 May 2020), and clinical registries were searched via CENTRAL. We also did a forward-backward citation search of the included studies.Inclusion criteriaWe included randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing face mask use to any active intervention or to control.Data extraction and analysisTwo author pairs independently screened articles for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. The primary outcomes were compliance, discomforts, harms and adverse events of wearing face masks.ResultsWe screened 5471 articles, including 37 (40 references); 11 were meta-analysed. For mask wear adherence, 47% (95% CI 25% to 68%, p<0.0001), more people wore face masks in the face mask group compared with control; adherence was significantly higher (26%, 95% CI 8% to 46%, p<0.01) in the surgical/medical mask group than in N95/P2 group. The largest number of studies reported on the discomfort and irritation outcome (20 studies); fewest reported on the misuse of masks, and none reported on mask contamination or risk compensation behaviour. Risk of bias was generally high for blinding of participants and personnel and low for attrition and reporting biases.ConclusionsThere are insufficient data to quantify all of the adverse effects that might reduce the acceptability, adherence and effectiveness of face masks. New research on face masks should assess and report the harms and downsides. Urgent research is also needed on methods and designs to mitigate the downsides of face mask wearing, particularly the assessment of possible alternatives.Systematic review registrationOpen Science Framework website https://osf.io/sa6kf/ (timestamp 20-05-2020).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Facial dermatoses induced by face masks: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Justin, Lim Yi Shen
    Yew, Yik Weng
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2022, 87 (06) : 473 - 484
  • [2] Face masks to prevent transmission of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yanni
    Liang, Mingming
    Gao, Liang
    Ahmed, Mubashir Ayaz
    Uy, John Patrick
    Cheng, Ce
    Zhou, Qin
    Sun, Chenyu
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2021, 49 (07) : 900 - 906
  • [3] The impact of face masks on performance and physiological outcomes during exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shaw, Keely A.
    Zello, Gordon A.
    Butcher, Scotty J.
    Ko, Jong Bum
    Bertrand, Leandy
    Chilibeck, Philip D.
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2021, 46 (07) : 693 - 703
  • [4] Face masks to prevent transmission of respiratory infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on face mask use
    Ollila, Hanna M.
    Partinen, Markku
    Koskela, Jukka
    Borghi, John
    Savolainen, Riikka
    Rotkirch, Anna
    Laine, Liisa T.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [5] Impact of methane mitigation strategies on the native ruminant microbiome: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Frazier, A. Nathan
    Belk, Aeriel D.
    Beck, Matthew R.
    Koziel, Jacek A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [6] Intraoperative Transfusion Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Allen, George
    [J]. AORN JOURNAL, 2022, 116 (06) : 587 - 591
  • [7] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Non-Face-to-Face Coaching
    Kim, Yucheon
    Lee, Songyi
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies to promote vaccination uptake
    Liu, Sicong
    Durantini, Marta R.
    Calabrese, Christopher
    Sanchez, Flor
    Albarracin, Dolores
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2024, 8 (09):
  • [9] Effectiveness of preoxygenation strategies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    de Carvalho, Clistenes Cnstian
    Iliff, Helen A.
    Neto, Jayme M. Santos
    Potter, Thomas
    Alves, Max B.
    Blake, Lindsay
    El-Boghdadly, Kariem
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 133 (01) : 152 - 163
  • [10] Rehabilitation strategies in maxillofacial trauma: systematic review and meta-analysis
    dos Santos, Karoline Weber
    Rech, Rafaela Soares
    Da Ros Wendland, Eliana Marcia
    Hilgert, Juliana Balbinot
    [J]. ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2020, 24 (01): : 1 - 10