Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective

被引:256
|
作者
Gordon, Lawrence A. [1 ]
Loeb, Martin P. [1 ]
Tseng, Chih-Yang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Accounting, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
关键词
Enterprise risk management; Firm performance; Contingency theory; Management control systems; EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION; ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; IMPACT; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In recent years, a paradigm shift has occurred regarding the way organizations view risk management. Instead of looking at risk management from a silo-based perspective, the trend is to take a holistic view of risk management. This holistic approach toward managing an organization's risk is commonly referred to as enterprise risk management (ERM). Indeed, there is growing support for the general argument that organizations will improve their performance by employing the ERM concept. The basic argument presented in this paper is that the relation between ERM and firm performance is contingent upon the appropriate match between ERM and the following five factors affecting a firm: environmental uncertainty, industry competition, firm size, firm complexity, and board of directors' monitoring. Based on a sample of 1] 2 US firms that disclose the implementation of their ERM activities within their 10Ks and 10Qs filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, empirical evidence confirms the above basic argument. The implication of these findings is that firms should consider the implementation of an ERM system in conjunction with contextual variables surrounding the firm. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 327
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enterprise risk management and firm performance
    Quon, Tony K.
    Zeghal, Daniel
    Maingot, Michael
    [J]. WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (BEM-2012), 2012, 62 : 263 - 267
  • [2] The impact of digital transformation on firm performance: a perspective from enterprise risk management
    Xu, Na
    Lv, Wendong
    Wang, Junli
    [J]. EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 14 (02) : 369 - 400
  • [3] Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee
    Malik, Muhammad Farhan
    Zaman, Mahbub
    Buckby, Sherrena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2020, 16 (01)
  • [4] Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case
    Florio, Cristina
    Leoni, Giulia
    [J]. BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 49 (01): : 56 - 74
  • [5] Relationship between strategic human resource management and firm performance - A contingency perspective
    Chang, WJA
    Huang, TC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 2005, 26 (05) : 434 - 449
  • [6] Enterprise Risk Management Perspective
    Yilmaz, Ayse Kucuk
    Karakoc, T. Hikmet
    [J]. GLOBAL WARMING: ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, 2010, : 423 - 437
  • [7] Enterprise management innovation in the internet of things from the perspective of contingency
    Chen, Weiling
    Song, Xiaogang
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2019, 37 (05): : 5829 - 5836
  • [8] Enterprise risk management and firm performance: evidence from Malaysian nonfinancial firms
    Shahrin, Aidil Rizal
    Ibrahim, Abdul Hakam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RISK, 2021, 16 (04): : 27 - 43
  • [9] The influence of enterprise risk management on firm performance with the moderating effect of intellectual capital dimensions
    Saeidi, Parvaneh
    Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa
    Gutierrez, Leonardo
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Alrasheedi, Melfi
    Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo
    Mardani, Abbas
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2021, 34 (01): : 122 - 151
  • [10] Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Ghana equity market
    Horvey, Sylvester Senyo
    Ankamah, Jacob
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 8 (01):