Multifidelity Framework for Modeling Combustion Dynamics

被引:6
|
作者
Huang, Cheng [1 ]
Anderson, William E. [2 ]
Merkle, Charles L. [2 ]
Sankaran, Venkateswaran [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Sch Aeronaut & Astronaut, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] US Air Force, Res Lab, Rocket Prop Div, Edwards AFB, CA 93524 USA
关键词
FLAME DESCRIBING FUNCTION; REDUCED-ORDER MODELS; CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL; INSTABILITY; SIMULATION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.2514/1.J057061
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A multifidelity framework oriented toward efficient modeling of combustion dynamics that integrates a reducedorder model (ROM) for the combustion response into the Euler equations is proposed. The ROM is developed from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of a combusting flow that is periodically forced at the boundaries of a reduced domain. Galerkin ' s method is used to reduce the high-order partial differential equations to a low-order ordinary differential equation system via proper orthogonal decomposition eigenbases generated from a reduceddomain dataset. Evaluations of the framework are performed based on parametric studies of a simplified test problem for a model combustor showing distinguishable combustion instability behavior. Two-way information transfer between the ROM and Euler solutions is accomplished by interface matching at the boundaries of the reduced domain. It is shown that accurate predictions require the use of multiple ROMs to account for both upstream-and downstream-traveling perturbations. Characteristic boundary conditions are required at both reduced-domain boundaries to minimize wave reflections and preclude generic unstable responses in the multifidelity model predictions. Comparisons with CFD solutions show the multifidelity model is capable of capturing overall instability trends.
引用
收藏
页码:2055 / 2068
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Internal Combustion Engine Modeling Framework in Simulink: Gas Dynamics Modeling
    Thompson, Bradley
    Yoon, Hwan-Sik
    [J]. MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [2] A Multifidelity Framework for Aerothermodynamic Modeling and Simulation of Destructive Atmospheric Entry
    Morgado, Fabio
    Peddakotla, Sai Abhishek
    Graham, Julie
    Vasile, Massimiliano
    Fossati, Marco
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2024, 62 (06) : 1988 - 2007
  • [3] Nonlinear modeling and control of combustion dynamics
    Active-Adaptive Control Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States
    [J]. Lect. Notes Control Inf. Sci., 2006, (95-121):
  • [4] Modeling natural gas combustion dynamics
    Wagman, David
    [J]. POWER ENGINEERING, 2008, 112 (04) : 38 - 38
  • [5] Nonlinear modeling and control of combustion dynamics
    Annaswamy, Anuradha M.
    [J]. CONTROL OF FLUID FLOW, 2006, 330 : 95 - 121
  • [6] A modeling framework for actin dynamics
    Weitzke, EL
    Loew, LM
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 88 (01) : 499A - 499A
  • [7] Multifidelity Framework for Small Satellite Thermal Analysis
    Kontaxoglou, Anastasios
    Tsutsumi, Seiji
    Khan, Samir
    Nakasuka, Shinichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2024, 61 (01) : 61 - 71
  • [8] Multifidelity Modeling of Ultrasonic Testing Simulations with Cokriging
    Leifsson, Leifur
    Du, Xiaosong
    Koziel, Slawomir
    [J]. 2018 IEEE MTT-S INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL ELECTROMAGNETIC AND MULTIPHYSICS MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION (NEMO), 2018,
  • [9] Surrogate modeling of multifidelity data for large samples
    E. V. Burnaev
    A. A. Zaytsev
    [J]. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, 2015, 60 : 1348 - 1355
  • [10] Surrogate modeling and multifidelity approach in computer experimentation
    De Lozzo, Matthias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SFDS, 2015, 156 (04): : 21 - 55