Procedural due process of law in the United States Supreme Court: building an instrumental safeguard

被引：0

作者：

Vitorelli, Edilson ^{[1
,2
,3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA 94305 USA

[2] Harvard Law Sch, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

[3] Univ Presbiteriana Mackenzie, Sao Paulo, Brazil

[4] Escola Super Minist Publ Uniao, Brasilia, DF, Brazil

来源：

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE DIREITO | 2019年 / 15卷 / 01期

关键词：

history of civil procedure; Due process of law; Comparative Law;

D O I：

10.18256/2238-0604.2019.v15i1.2053

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This paper aims to reconstruct the history and evolution of the procedural due process of law in the United States Supreme Court Precedents. Besides casting light over the period of the formation of this procedural safeguard, that would become the center of modern civil procedure, exerting considerable influence over Brazilian scholars, the purpose of the paper is to clarify that, however important, due process is currently seen as an instrumental safeguard, subject to ponderation with other values at stake in the case.

引用

下载

页码：78 / 105

页数：28

共 50 条

[1] THE EVOLUTION OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW IN THE DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Bird, Francis W.
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1913, 13 (01) : 37 - 50
[2] DUE PROCESS OF LAW, POLICE POWER, AND THE SUPREME COURT
Brown, Ray A.
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1927, 40 (07) : 943 - 968
[3] The United States Supreme Court and health law: The year in review
Ruger, Theodore W.
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2006, 34 (04): : 817 - 820
[4] The United States Supreme Court. Law, Politics and Democracy
Guerlain, Pierre
REVUE FRANCAISE D ETUDES AMERICAINES, 2015, (143): : 106 - 107
[5] THE MASSACHUSETTS TORRENS LAW BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
不详
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1901, 14 (07) : 529 - 530
[6] The United States Supreme Court and health law: The year in review
Ruger, TW
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2005, 33 (03): : 611 - 615
[7] THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Powell, Thomas Reed
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1928, 41 (08) : 1071 - 1075
[8] SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Kagan, J.
REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (56):
[9] In the Supreme Court of the United States
不详
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 2011, 30 (04) : 533 - 540
[10] THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Landis, J. M.
ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 1929, 24 (03): : 358 - 362

← 1 2 3 4 5 →