Dental radiographic guidelines: A review

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Irene H. [1 ,2 ]
Mupparapu, Muralidhar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Dent Sch, Dept Diagnost Sci, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Newark, NJ 07101 USA
[2] Morristown Mem Hosp, Morristown, NJ USA
来源
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL | 2009年 / 40卷 / 05期
关键词
compliance; dental radiograph; radiation dose; radiographic guidelines; SELECTION CRITERIA; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FDA GUIDELINES; EFFICACY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The 2004 American Dental Association (ADA)/US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) radiographic selection criteria and guidelines were reviewed and compared with the prior radiographic selection criteria and guidelines. The authors reviewed the publications from the US FDA, US Department of Health and Human Services, and National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. The positions outlined by the Canadian Dental Association and the European Commission were also reviewed and compared to US guidelines. The FDA guidelines were first published in 1987, and several changes have been made to them over the years. Recent literature reveals that the general compliance of these guidelines is very low, especially within dental schools in the United States and Canada. Little is known about the compliance outside of the dental school environment; however, it is expected to be low for various reasons. In 2007, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) revised its estimates of tissue radiosensitivity, which resulted in effective doses of dental radiographs 32% to 422% higher than the 1990 ICRP guidelines. Flow charts summarizing the latest guidelines were developed to facilitate general compliance among practitioners. Based on the literature reviewed and the recent ICRP findings, it would be prudent for dental health care professionals to follow dental radiographic guidelines. (Quintessence Int 2009; 40: 389-398)
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 398
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adopting dental radiographic guidelines for selection criteria
    Johnson, K. Brandon
    Green, Peter T.
    Dorsey, Anne K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 152 (06): : 415 - 420
  • [2] VALIDITY OF THE RADIOGRAPHIC METHOD IN THE PRETREATMENT REVIEW OF DENTAL CLAIMS
    BAILIT, HL
    REISINE, ST
    DAMUTH, RL
    RICHARDS, NP
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 1980, 40 (01) : 26 - 38
  • [3] Radiation Doses of Common Dental Radiographic Examinations: A Review
    Brooks, Sharon L.
    ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2008, 42 (03) : 207 - 217
  • [4] Radiographic diagnosis of dental restoration misfit: a systematic review
    Liedke, G. S. y
    Spin-Neto, R.
    da Silveira, H. E. D.
    Wenzel, A.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2014, 41 (12) : 957 - 967
  • [5] Guidelines for radiation protection in dental radiographic examinations: a questionnaire-based summary
    Lee, Eun-Gyeong
    Jang, Gye Won
    Lee, Kyeong Hee
    Kweon, Dae Cheol
    RADIATION EFFECTS AND DEFECTS IN SOLIDS, 2021, 176 (5-6): : 397 - 411
  • [6] Radiographic guidelines
    Weisman, MI
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 127 (04): : 426 - &
  • [7] Dental trauma and prevention guidelines: a narrative review
    D'Amico, Cesare
    Fiorillo, Luca
    Cervino, Gabriele
    Cicciu, Marco
    Laino, Luigi
    MINERVA DENTAL AND ORAL SCIENCE, 2023, 72 (06) : 332 - 341
  • [8] Radiographic guidelines - Response
    White, SC
    Atchison, KA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 127 (04): : 428 - 428
  • [9] Dental radiographic interpretation
    Niemiec, BA
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DENTISTRY, 2005, 22 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [10] Correlation of Dental Maturity with Skeletal Maturity from Radiographic Assessment: A Review
    Morris, John M.
    Park, Jae Hyun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2012, 36 (03) : 309 - 314