AUTONOMOUS PUBLIC ORGANIZATION POLICY: A CASE STUDY FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR IN THAILAND

被引:0
|
作者
Rajataramya, B. [1 ]
Fried, B. [2 ]
van der Puetten, M. [3 ]
Pongpanich, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Minist Publ Hlth, Praboromarajchanok Inst Hlth Manpower Dev, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Thammasat Univ, Fac Publ Hlth, Pathum Thani, Thailand
[4] Chulalongkorn Univ, Coll Publ Hlth Sci, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper describes factors affecting autonomous public organization (APO) policy agenda setting and policy formation through comparison of policy processes applied to one educational institute under the Ministry of Education and the other educational institute under the Ministry of Public Health in Thailand. This study employs mixed method including a qualitative approach through documentary research, in-depth interviews, and participant observation. Factors that facilitated the formulation of the APO policy were: (1) awareness of need; (2) clarity of strategies; (3) leadership, advocacy, and strategic partnerships, (4) clear organizational identity; (5) participatory approach to policy formulation, and (6) identification of a policy window. Factors that impeded the formulation of the APO policy were: (1) diverting political priorities; (2) ill-defined organizational identity; (3) fluctuating leadership direction, (4) inadequate participation of stakeholders; and (5) political instability. Although findings cannot be generalized, this case study does offer benchmarking for those in search of ways to enhance processes of policy formulation.
引用
收藏
页码:1092 / 1102
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ORGANIZATIONAL DECLINE IN PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATION: KEY PUBLIC POLICY
    Vinarski-Peretz, Hedva
    [J]. INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND DIGITAL ECOSYSTEMS, 2016, : 1862 - 1874
  • [2] The 10-year performance after transformation to an autonomous hospital (public organization): A case study of a district hospital in Thailand
    Kessomboon, N.
    Soonthon, S.
    Putthasri, W.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2014, 10 (05): : E54 - E54
  • [3] Reforming the health sector in Thailand: The role of policy actors on the policy stage
    Green, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 15 (01): : 39 - 59
  • [4] POLICY ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC SECTOR STRATEGY: THE CASE OF LONDON HEALTH REFORM
    Oborn, Eivor
    Barrett, Michael
    Exworthy, Mark
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2011, 89 (02) : 325 - 344
  • [5] SIMULATING EFFICIENCY IN CHANGE PROCESSES: A CASE STUDY FROM A PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATION
    Manyri, Laurent
    Gros-Desormeaux, Jean-Raphael
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES ON ICT, SOCIETY AND HUMAN BEINGS 2014, WEB BASED COMMUNITIES AND SOCIAL MEDIA 2014, E-COMMERCE 2014, INFORMATION SYSTEMS POST-IMPLEMENTATION AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 2014 AND E-HEALTH 2014, 2014, : 343 - 346
  • [6] How should public health policy be developed? A case study in European public health
    Birt, CA
    GunningSchepers, L
    Hayes, A
    Joyce, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1997, 19 (03): : 262 - 267
  • [7] The Greenhouse Gas Accounting of A Public Organization: The Case of A Public University in Thailand.
    Kandananond, Karin
    [J]. POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, (CPESE 2017), 2017, 141 : 672 - 676
  • [8] Public policy and private sector provision of health services
    Rosenthal, G
    Newbrander, W
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 11 (03): : 203 - 216
  • [9] Dilemmas of Policy Innovation in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the National Innovation Summit
    Marsh, Ian
    Edwards, Lindy
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 68 (04) : 399 - 413
  • [10] Environmental performance policy indicators for the public sector: The case of the defence sector
    Ramos, Tomas B.
    Alves, Ines
    Subtil, Rui
    Joanaz de Melo, Joao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 82 (04) : 410 - 432