A risk prediction model for medical treatment failure in tubal pregnancy

被引:7
|
作者
Lee, Jae Hoon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sunghoon [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Inha [1 ,2 ]
Yun, Jisun [1 ,2 ]
Yun, Bo Hyon [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Young Sik [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Byung Seok [1 ,2 ]
Seo, Seok Kyo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Inst Womens Life Med Sci, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Tubal pregnancy; Methotrexate treatment; Risk prediction model; Medical treatment failure; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; DOSE SYSTEMIC METHOTREXATE; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; METAANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.020
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Methotrexate is an alternative treatment for tubal pregnancy. However, despite initial treatment, similar to 15% of women eventually require surgery. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for medical treatment failure in tubal pregnancy and apply them to a risk prediction model. Study design: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 123 participants initially treated medically for tubal pregnancy between January 2006 and December 2015. Logistic regression analysis was used to construct a risk prediction model (visually presented as a nomogram) for medical treatment failure. Model performance was assessed using discrimination and calibration. The medical treatment failure rate was 36.6%. The prediction model integrated the presence of a gestational sac, ectopic mass size, and follow-up beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels above cut-off values on days 4 and 7. The model used the following cut-off values: increased beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels by 1028.6 mIU/mL, 1.0457-fold higher than baseline level on day 4; and increased beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels by 1233 m1U/mL, 1.3025-fold higher than baseline level on day 7. Results: The corresponding areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were 0.8135 (95% confidence interval, 0.733-0.893) for the day 4 model and 0.8600 for the day 7 model (95% confidence interval, 0.788-0.932). Comparison of the day 4 and 7 models revealed no significant difference in their predictive abilities (P=0.4318). Conclusions: This model identified a substantial proportion of the participants who experienced medical treatment failure for tubal pregnancy. It was visualized as a nomogram, facilitating clinical application. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Density of tubal ring vascularization: A new marker for prediction of success of medical treatment in tubal ectopic pregnancy
    Aydogmus, Serpil
    Aydogmus, Huseyin
    Gencdal, Servet
    Kelekci, Sefa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 217 : 113 - 118
  • [2] Risk factors for methotrexate treatment failure in tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study
    Fu, Linru
    Liu, Xinyan
    Tian, Zhao
    Du, Zhe
    Wang, Xinyi
    Wang, Xiuqi
    Li, Xiaodong
    Xu, Tao
    Sun, Zhijing
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [3] A Model to Predict Treatment Failure of Single-Dose Methotrexate in Patients with Tubal Pregnancy
    Chen, Si
    Zhu, Fangfang
    Zhang, Yingxuan
    Li, Jing
    Gao, Jie
    Deng, Gaopi
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2020, 26
  • [4] DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF TUBAL PREGNANCY AS RELATED TO RISK DETERMINANTS
    LUNDORFF, P
    THORBURN, J
    LINDBLOM, B
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1991, 40 (03): : 191 - 196
  • [6] Medical management of tubal pregnancy
    不详
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (06): : B1 - B7
  • [7] Laparoscopy-aided medical or surgical treatment for tubal pregnancy
    Li, Yiu-Tai
    Pan, Chuan-chien
    Chang, Wen-Hsun
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (04) : 832 - 832
  • [8] TREATMENT OF TUBAL PREGNANCY
    CHAPRON, C
    POULY, JL
    MANHES, H
    MAGE, G
    CANIS, M
    WATTIEZ, A
    BRUHAT, MA
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1991, 56 (02) : 374 - 375
  • [9] TREATMENT OF TUBAL PREGNANCY
    ISAACS, JH
    OCONNOR, JS
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1964, 23 (02): : 187 - &
  • [10] TREATMENT OF TUBAL PREGNANCY
    ROSENBLUM, JM
    DOWLING, RW
    BARNES, AC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1960, 80 (02) : 274 - 277