Comparative dose-response study of hyperbaric ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in singleton versus twin pregnancies

被引:13
|
作者
Mei, Zhong [1 ,2 ]
Kee, Warwick D. Ngan [3 ]
Sheng, Zhi-min [1 ]
Hu, Li-juan [1 ]
Wu, Zhan-huai [1 ]
Lyu, Chang-cheng [1 ]
Chen, Xin-zhong [1 ]
Qian, Xiao-wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Xueshi Rd 1, Hangzhou 310006, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Xiaoshan Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Sidra Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Spinal anesthesia; Cesarean delivery; Ropivacaine; Singleton pregnancies; Twin pregnancies; INTRATHECAL ROPIVACAINE; BUPIVACAINE; SECTION; ED50; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; SPREAD; BLOCK; SUFENTANIL; OPIOIDS; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110068
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study objective: It is controversial whether local anesthetic dose requirement for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery differs between patients with singleton and patients with multiple gestation pregnancies. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the ED50 and ED90 for hyperbaric ropivacaine used for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in patients with singleton pregnancies versus patients with twin pregnancies. Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative dose-finding study. Setting: Operating room, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Patients: 100 patients with singleton pregnancies (Group S) and 100 patients with twin pregnancies (Group T) presenting for scheduled cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in the study. Interventions: Patients in Group S or Group T were randomly allocated to receive 9.5, 11, 12.5, 14 or 15.5 mg of hyperbaric ropivacaine intrathecally. A dose was considered effective when it achieved a bilateral sensory block level at the T6 dermatome or above within 10 min after intrathecal injection, there was no numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score >= 3 intraoperatively, and there was no requirement for epidural supplementation at any time during anesthesia and operation. Values for ED50 and ED90 for ropivacaine were determined using probit regression. The difference in ropivacaine dose requirement between patients with singleton pregnancies and patients with twin pregnancies was assessed by calculating relative median potency. Measurements: Success rates for different intrathecal doses of ropivacaine, side effects and neonatal outcomes were recorded. Main results: The estimated (95% confidence interval) values for ED50 and ED90 of intrathecal ropivacaine in patients with singleton pregnancies were 11.2 (10.2 to 12.0) mg and 15.7 (14.4 to 18.3) mg, respectively. The values for ED50 and ED90 in patients with twin pregnancies were 10.5 (9.5 to 11.3) mg and 14.8 mg (13.6 to 17.0) mg, respectively. The estimate of relative median potency for ropivacaine between patients with singleton and twin pregnancies was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.04). Conclusion: Patients with singleton and twin pregnancies have similar dose requirement for hyperbaric ropivacaine used for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the setting of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia, no opioids, low weight cohort, insertion with the patients in the right lateral position, and nor epinephrine boluses.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative dose-response study of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean delivery in preterm singleton versus twin pregnancies
    Zhu, Miao
    Liu, Ju-Jun
    Shen, Yan-Ping
    Pan, Zheng-Bin
    Lv, Chang-Cheng
    Chen, Wen-Din
    Qian, Xiaowei
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023,
  • [2] Hyperbaric spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine coadministered with sufentanil for cesarean delivery: a dose-response study
    Zheng, Dongyue
    Wu, Guowei
    Qin, Peishun
    Ji, Bin
    Ye, Lisha
    Shi, Tong
    Huang, Huang
    Jin, Lexiao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (04): : 5739 - 5745
  • [4] Dose-response study of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean section.
    Chen X.Z.
    Chen H.
    Lou A.F.
    Lü C.C.
    [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B, 2006, 7 (12): : 992 - 997
  • [5] SPREAD OF SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION IN SINGLETON AND TWIN PREGNANCIES
    JAWAN, B
    LEE, JH
    CHONG, ZK
    CHANG, CS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 70 (06) : 639 - 641
  • [6] Hyperbaric Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
    Sia, Alex Tiong Heng
    Tan, Kok Hian
    Sng, Ban Leong
    Lim, Yvonne
    Chan, Edwin S. Y.
    Siddiqui, Fahad Javaid
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 120 (01): : 132 - 140
  • [7] Comparative dose-response study on norepinephrine infusion for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery in singleton versus twin pregnancies A randomized, double-blind, controlled, dose-finding trial
    Sheng, Zhimin
    Sun, Haotian
    Liu, Jinping
    Qian, Xiaowei
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 38 (08) : 895 - 897
  • [8] Comparative Dose-Response Study on the Infusion of Norepinephrine Combined with Crystalloid Coload versus Colloid Coload for Preventing Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
    Jin, Wei-dong
    Mao, Jun-qin
    Liu, Jie
    Liang, Gang
    Jiang, Chao
    Sheng, Zhi-min
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2022, 16 : 2617 - 2626
  • [9] A dose-response study of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery
    Kee, WDN
    Khaw, KS
    Lee, BB
    Lau, TK
    Gin, T
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (06): : 1390 - 1395
  • [10] Comparative Dose-Response Study of Phenylephrine Bolus for the Treatment of the First Episode of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension for Cesarean Delivery in Severe Preeclamptic versus Normotensive Parturients
    Hu, Li-Juan
    Mei, Zhong
    Shen, Yan-Ping
    Sun, Hao-Tian
    Sheng, Zhi-Min
    Chen, Xin-Zhong
    Qian, Xiao-Wei
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2022, 16 : 2189 - 2198