Dose escalation for non-small cell lung cancer using conformal radiation therapy

被引:142
|
作者
Robertson, JM
TenHaken, RK
Hazuka, MB
Turrisi, AT
Martel, MK
Pu, AT
Littles, JF
Martinez, FJ
Francis, IR
Quint, LE
Lichter, AS
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN,MED CTR,DEPT RADIAT ONCOL,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
[2] UNIV MICHIGAN,MED CTR,DEPT INTERNAL MED,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
[3] UNIV MICHIGAN,MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
关键词
non-small cell lung cancer; conformal radiation therapy; three-dimensional treatment planning; radiation therapy; Phase I clinical trials; radiation pneumonitis;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00593-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Improved local control of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be possible with an increased dose of radiation. Three-dimensional radiation treatment planning (3D RTP) was used to design a radiation therapy (RT) dose escalation trial, where the dose was determined by (a) the effective volume of normal lung irradiated, and (b) the estimated risk of a complication. Preliminary results of this trial were reviewed. Methods and Materials: A graph of the iso-normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) levels associated with a dose and effective volume (V-eff) was derived, using normal tissue parameters derived from the literature. This led to a dose escalation schema, where patients were sorted into 1 of 5 treatment bins, determined by the V-eff of the best possible treatment plan. The starting doses ranged from 63 to 84 Gy. Each treatment bin was then escalated separately, as in Phase I dose escalation fashion, with Grade greater than or equal to 3 radiation pneumonitis defined as dose limiting. To anoa for dose escalation, we required patient follow-up to be greater than or equal to 6 months for at least three patients. 3D treatment planning was used to irradiate only the radiographically abnormal areas, with 2.1 Gy (corrected for lung inhomogeneity)/day. Clinically uninvolved lymph nodes were not treated prophylactically. Results: A total of 48 NSCLC patients have been treated (Stage I/II: 18 patients; Stage III: 28 patients; mediastinal recurrence postsurgery: 2 patients). No radiation pneumonitis has been observed in the 30 patients currently evaluable beyond the 6-month time point. All treatment bins have been escalated at least once. Current doses in the five treatment bins are 69.3, 69.3, 75.6, 84, and 92.4 Gy. None of the 15 evaluable patients in any bin with greater than or equal to 30% NTCP experienced clinical radiation pneumonitis, implying that the actual risk is <20% (beta error rate 5%). Despite the observation of the clinically negative lymph nodes at high risk, there has been no failure in the untreated mediastinum as the sole site of first failure. Three of 10 patients receiving greater than or equal to 84 Gy have had biopsy proven residual or locally recurrent disease. Conclusion: Successful dose escalation in a volume-dependent organ can be performed using this technique. By incorporating the effective volume of irradiated tissue, some patients have been treated to a total dose of radiation over 50% higher than traditional doses. The literature-derived parameters appear to overestimate pneumonitis risk with higher volumes. There has been no obvious negative effect due to exclusion of elective lymph node radiation. When completed, this trial will have determined the maximum tolerable dose of RT as a single agent for NSCLC and the appropriate dose for Phase II investigation. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1085
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dose escalation of chart in non-small cell lung cancer: Is three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy really necessary?
    McGibney, C
    Holmberg, O
    McClean, B
    Williams, C
    McCrea, P
    Sutton, P
    Armstrong, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (02): : 339 - 350
  • [2] Radiation dose escalation in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung
    Arriagada, R
    Komaki, R
    Cox, JD
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2004, 14 (04) : 287 - 291
  • [3] Radiation induced pulmonary toxicity and dose escalation in non-small cell lung cancer
    Ceresoli, G
    Cattaneo, GM
    Schipani, S
    Villa, E
    [J]. TUMORI JOURNAL, 2001, 87 (04): : S32 - S35
  • [4] A review of radiation dose escalation trials for non-small cell lung cancer within the radiation therapy oncology group
    Bradley, J
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) : S111 - S113
  • [5] RADIATION THERAPY OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER WITH DOSE ESCALATION ON COBALT 60 GAMMA UNITS.
    Sotnikov, V.
    Kharchenko, V.
    Panshin, G.
    Nikolaeva, E.
    Ivashin, A.
    Scvortsova, O.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S288 - S289
  • [6] Accelerated dose escalation with proton beam therapy for non-small cell lung cancer
    Gomez, Daniel R.
    Chang, Joe Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2014, 6 (04) : 348 - 355
  • [7] A planning study of proton therapy dose escalation for non-small cell lung cancer
    Hessels, Arno C.
    Visser, Sabine
    Both, Stefan
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Wijsman, Robin
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31
  • [8] PET IMAGING FOR DOSE ESCALATION IN NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
    De Ruysscher, D.
    van Elmpt, W.
    Ollers, M.
    Lambin, P.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S89 - S89
  • [9] Optimizing Collimator Margins for Isotoxically Dose-Escalated Conformal Radiation Therapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Warren, Samantha
    Panettieri, Vanessa
    Panakis, Niki
    Bates, Nicholas
    Lester, Jason F.
    Jain, Pooja
    Landau, David B.
    Nahum, Alan E.
    Mayles, W. Philip M.
    Fenwick, John D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (05): : 1148 - 1153
  • [10] Dose escalation in non-small-cell lung cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy: Update of a phase I trial
    Hayman, JA
    Martel, MK
    Ten Haken, RK
    Normolle, DP
    Todd, RF
    Littles, JF
    Sullivan, MA
    Possert, PW
    Turrisi, AT
    Lichter, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (01) : 127 - 136