Causal inference in genetic trio studies

被引:21
|
作者
Bates, Stephen [1 ,5 ]
Sesia, Matteo [2 ]
Sabatti, Chiara [1 ,3 ]
Candes, Emmanuel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Dept Data Sci & Operat, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Math, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Berkeley, CA 94709 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
transmission disequilibrium test (TDT); family-based association test (FBAT); causal discovery; false discovery rate (FDR); conditional independence testing; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; FAMILY-BASED TESTS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; ASSOCIATION TESTS; RISK; TRAIT; MODEL; SAMPLE; PC;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2007743117
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We introduce a method to draw causal inferences-inferences immune to all possible confounding-from genetic data that include parents and offspring. Causal conclusions are possible with these data because the natural randomness in meiosis can be viewed as a high-dimensional randomized experiment. We make this observation actionable by developing a conditional independence test that identifies regions of the genome containing distinct causal variants. The proposed digital twin test compares an observed offspring to carefully constructed synthetic offspring from the same parents to determine statistical significance, and it can leverage any black-box multivariate model and additional nontrio genetic data to increase power. Crucially, our inferences are based only on a well-established mathematical model of recombination and make no assumptions about the relationship between the genotypes and phenotypes. We compare our method to the widely used transmission disequilibrium test and demonstrate enhanced power and localization.
引用
收藏
页码:24117 / 24126
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE EFFECT OF GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY ON CAUSAL INFERENCE IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES
    KHOURY, MJ
    STEWART, W
    BEATY, TH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 126 (04) : 561 - 567
  • [2] Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies
    Davey Smith, George
    Hemani, Gibran
    [J]. HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2014, 23 : R89 - R98
  • [3] CAUSAL INFERENCE AND ASTON STUDIES
    PUGH, DS
    HICKSON, DJ
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1972, 17 (02) : 273 - 276
  • [4] PANEL STUDIES AND CAUSAL INFERENCE
    BIDDLE, BJ
    SLAVINGS, RL
    ANDERSON, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1985, 21 (01): : 79 - 93
  • [5] Causal Inference for Observational Studies
    Kaplan, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 219 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [6] CAUSAL INFERENCE IN RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES
    HOLLAND, PW
    RUBIN, DB
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1988, 12 (03) : 203 - 231
  • [7] Causation and causal inference for genetic effects
    Stijn Vansteelandt
    Christoph Lange
    [J]. Human Genetics, 2012, 131 : 1665 - 1676
  • [8] Causation and causal inference for genetic effects
    Vansteelandt, Stijn
    Lange, Christoph
    [J]. HUMAN GENETICS, 2012, 131 (10) : 1665 - 1676
  • [9] Causal inference in environmental impact studies
    Beyers, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 17 (03): : 367 - 373
  • [10] CAUSAL INFERENCE IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES: IS IT A FAD?
    Xue, Q.
    Tian, J.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2013, 53 : 30 - 30