Can courts rescue national democracy? Judicial safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU

被引:59
|
作者
Blauberger, Michael [1 ]
Kelemen, R. Daniel [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Salzburg Univ, Salzburg Ctr European Union Studies, Salzburg, Austria
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Polit Sci & Law, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, European Union Polit, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
Democratic backsliding; European Union; infringement proceedings; judicial safeguards; private litigation; LAW;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2016.1229357
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article explores the potential efficacy and limitations of judicial mechanisms as tools to combat democratic backsliding in European Union (EU) member states. The article argues that more can be done to maximize the effectiveness of existing judicial tools, such as infringement proceedings brought to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) by the Commission and private enforcement litigation in national courts. At the same time, we highlight risks inherent in many proposals for novel judicial tools to defend national democracy. We conclude that despite their importance, judicial safeguards alone -whether existing ones or novel proposals -will not suffice to stop democratic backsliding by a determined national government: if the Union is to rein in such attacks on its core values, heads of government and other EU leaders will have to intervene politically as well.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 336
页数:16
相关论文
共 27 条