Management of Asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White Pattern by Pediatric Electrophysiologists

Objective To determine the present-day approach of pediatric cardiac electrophysiologists to asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) pattern and to contrast to both published consensus statements and a similar survey. Study design A questionnaire was sent to 266 Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society physician members in 25 countries; 21 questions from the 2003 survey were repeated, with new questions added regarding risk stratification and decision making. Results We received 113 responses from 13 countries, with responders having extensive electrophysiology experience (median 15 years [IQR 8.5-25 years]). Only 12 (11%) believed that intermittent pre-excitation and 37 (33%) that sudden loss of pre-excitation on exercise test were sufficient evidence of accessory pathway safety to avoid an invasive electrophysiology study. Optimal weight for electrophysiology study was 20 kg (IQR 18-22.5 kg), and 61 % and 58% would then ablate all right-sided or left-sided accessory pathways, respectively, regardless of electrophysiological properties, whereas only 23% would ablate all septal accessory pathways (P < .001). Compared with 2003, respondents were more likely to consider inducible arrhythmia (77% vs 26%, P < .001) as sufficient indication alone for ablation. Conclusions In the context of recent literature regarding the reliability of risk-stratification tools, most operators are now performing electrophysiology study for asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White regardless of noninvasive findings. Many will then proceed to default ablation of all accessory pathways distant from critical conduction structures.