WHAT'S THE PROTOCOL? CANADIAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH ETHICS BOARDS AND VARIATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING TRI-COUNCIL POLICY

被引:0
|
作者
Stephenson, Grace Karram [1 ]
Jones, Glen A. [1 ]
Fick, Emmanuelle [1 ]
Begin-Caouette, Olivier [2 ]
Taiyeb, Aamir [1 ]
Metcalfe, Amy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, OISE, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION | 2020年 / 50卷 / 01期
关键词
research ethics; university ethics; higher education; social science research; harmonization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article is concerned with the differences in REB policy and application processes across Canada as they impact multi-jurisdictional, higher education research projects that collect data at universities themselves. Despite the guiding principles of the Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 (TCPS2) there is significant variation among the practices of Research Ethics Boards (REBs) at Canada's universities, particularly when they respond to requests from researchers outside their own institution. The data for this paper were gathered through a review of research ethics applications at 69 universities across Canada. The findings suggest REBs use a range of different application systems and require different revisions and types of oversight for researchers who are not employed at their institution. This paper recommends further harmonization between REBs across the country and national-level dialogue on TCPS2 interpretations.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 81
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] The Tri-Council Policy Statement and Research in Cyberspace: Research Ethics, the Internet, and Revising a ‘Living Document’
    Heather A. Kitchin
    [J]. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2003, 1 (4) : 397 - 418
  • [2] Myths about qualitative research and the Tri-Council Policy Statement
    Ells, Carolyn
    Gutfreund, Shawna
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY-CAHIERS CANADIENS DE SOCIOLOGIE, 2006, 31 (03): : 361 - 373
  • [3] Evolving ethics envy-New Zealand sociologists reading the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans
    Tolich, M.
    Smith, B. P.
    [J]. KOTUITUI-NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ONLINE, 2014, 9 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [4] More than just great quotes: An introduction to the Canadian Tri-Council's qualitative requirements
    Boffa, Jody
    Moules, Nancy
    Mayan, Maria
    Cowie, Robert L.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES & MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (02): : 103 - 108
  • [5] Policy Writing as Dialogue: Drafting an Aboriginal Chapter for Canada's Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans
    Castellano, Marlene Brant
    Reading, Jeff
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS POLICY JOURNAL, 2010, 1 (02)
  • [6] Review of a mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging by Canadian research ethics boards
    de Champlain, J.
    Patenaude, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2006, 32 (09) : 530 - 534
  • [7] How research ethics boards are undermining survey research on Canadian university students
    Grayson J.P.
    Myles R.
    [J]. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2005, 2 (4) : 293 - 314
  • [8] A research project exempted from an ethical review: Reflections and questions on article 2.1 of the Tri-Council Policy Statement
    Durand, Celine
    Fortin, Marie-Chantal
    [J]. BIOETHIQUEONLINE, 2012, 1
  • [9] Canadian policy on reporting breaches of research integrity: When should Research Ethics Boards be informed?
    Page, Stacey A.
    Stalker, M. Anne
    [J]. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2019, 26 (07): : 460 - 471
  • [10] Who's minding the shop? the role of Canadian research ethics boards in the creation and uses of registries and biobanks
    Gibson E.
    Brazil K.
    Coughlin M.D.
    Emerson C.
    Fournier F.
    Schwartz L.
    Szala-Meneok K.V.
    Weisbaum K.M.
    Willison D.J.
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 9 (1)