Patient perspectives on left main stem revascularization strategies, the OPINION-2 study

被引:0
|
作者
Nuis, Rutger-Jan [1 ]
Jadoon, Adeel [1 ]
van Dalen, Bas M. [2 ]
Dulfer, Karolijn [3 ]
Snelder, Sanne M. [2 ]
Yazdi, Mehrdad Talebian [2 ]
Masdjedi, Kaneshka [1 ]
den Dekker, Wijnand K. [1 ]
Diletti, Roberto [1 ]
Wilschut, Jeroen [1 ]
Daemen, Joost [1 ]
Lenzen, Mattie J. [1 ]
Zijlstra, Felix [1 ]
Smits, Pieter C. [4 ]
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Cardiol, Off Nt 645,Dr Molenwaterplein 40, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Sophia Childrens Univ Hosp, Erasmus Med Ctr, Intens Care Unit, Dept Paediat & Paediat Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Maasstad Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Left main stenosis; Coronary revascularization; Treatment preference; Shared-decision making; Patient-centered care; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; ELUTING STENTS; SURGERY; PREFERENCES; INVOLVEMENT; LONELINESS; GUIDELINES; MORTALITY; QUALITY; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.09.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment preferences in patients with left main (LM) stem disease and no prior revascularization are unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine (i) patient-reported importance ratings of particular features related to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, (ii) how these features determine treatment preference, and (iii) how educational and psychosocial background influence this preference. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study a total of 500 patients without previous revascularization who underwent diagnostic angiography for suspected coronary disease were asked to complete a case-vignette on a (hypothetical) LM stenosis qualifying for both PCI and CABG, in addition to 6 validated questionnaires to assess the influence of psychosocial factors on treatment preference. Results: Overall, 90% favored PCI over CABG because of the lower bleeding and stroke risk despite a higher likelihood for repeat revascularization. By multivariable regression, the only independent determinant of treatment preference for CABG was lower educational level (14% in low vs. 8% in higher educated patients, OR: 3.22, CI: 1.16-8.95, p = 0.025) while psychosocial variables were not associated. Compared to higher educated patients, those with lower educational level suffered more from depression, anxiety, loneliness, and uncertainty. Conclusions: Overall, patients who are informed about risk and benefits of each treatment modality clearly favor PCI over CABG and particularly value lower short-term morbidity while being aware of higher risk of repeat revascularization. Lower educational level was associated with a higher prevalence of psychosomatic phenotypes and a 14% preference for CABG. Educational and psychosocial background matter in the revascularization strategy decision-making process. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Japanese College of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 278
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient Perspectives on Left Main Stem Revascularization Strategies: The OPINION-2 Study
    Nuis, Rutger
    Jadoon, Adeel
    van Dalen, Bas
    Dulfer, Karolijn
    Masdjedi, Kaneshka
    Den Dekker, Wijnand
    Diletti, Roberto
    Wilschut, Jeroen
    Daemen, Joost
    Lenzen, Mattie
    Zijlstra, Felix
    Smits, Pieter
    Van Mieghem, Nicolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B130 - B131
  • [2] Revascularization strategies for left main coronary artery disease: current perspectives
    Elbatarny, Malak
    Cheema, Asim N.
    Mazine, Amine
    Verma, Subodh
    Yanagawa, Bobby
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (05) : 548 - 558
  • [3] Future Perspectives of Left Main Revascularization Trials
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Ueyama, Hiroki
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E.
    Thompson, Craig
    Takagi, Hisato
    Bangalore, Sripal
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 236
  • [4] Left Main Revascularization Surgical and Interventional Perspectives
    Sabik, Joseph F.
    Stone, Gregg W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (20) : 2207 - 2210
  • [5] Off-pump myocardial revascularization for left main stem disease in a high-risk patient
    Louagie, YAG
    Gonzalez, ME
    Schröder, E
    [J]. ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 1999, 99 (06) : 309 - 311
  • [6] Patient selection and percutaneous technique of unprotected left main revascularization
    Testa, L.
    Latib, A.
    Bollati, M.
    Bedogni, F.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 92 (04) : 637 - 643
  • [7] Hybrid coronary revascularization versus percutaneous strategies in left main stenosis: a propensity match study
    Repossini, Alberto
    Di Bacco, Lorenzo
    Rosati, Fabrizio
    Tespili, Maurizio
    Saino, Antonio
    Ielasi, Alfonso
    Muneretto, Claudio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (05) : 253 - 260
  • [8] An elderly patient with atresia of the left main stem
    Topuz, Mustafa
    Colkesen, Yucel
    Cosgun, Mehmet
    Cayli, Murat
    [J]. TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 43 (05): : 497 - 497
  • [9] An elderly patient with atresia of the left main stem
    Yuksel, Isa Oner
    Koklu, Erkan
    [J]. TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 43 (06): : 582 - 582
  • [10] Left main coronary revascularization strategies in the COVID-19 era
    Kornowski, Ran
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 98 (07) : 1262 - 1263