Achievable future conditions as a framework for guiding forest conservation and management

被引:43
|
作者
Golladay, S. W. [1 ]
Martin, K. L. [2 ]
Vose, J. M. [2 ]
Wear, D. N. [2 ]
Covich, A. P. [3 ]
Hobbs, R. J. [4 ]
Klepzig, K. D. [5 ]
Likens, G. E. [6 ,7 ]
Naiman, R. J. [8 ,9 ]
Shearer, A. W. [10 ]
机构
[1] JW Jones Ecol Res Ctr, Newton, GA 39870 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Ctr Integrated Forest Sci & Synth, US Forest Serv, USDA, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Univ Western Australia M090, Sch Plant Biol, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[5] US Forest Serv, USDA, Southern Res Stn, Asheville, NC 28804 USA
[6] Cary Inst Ecosyst Sci, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA
[7] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Environm Biol, Storrs, CT USA
[8] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Friday Harbor, WA 98250 USA
[9] Univ Western Australia, CENRM, Friday Harbor, WA 98250 USA
[10] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Architecture, Ctr Sustainable Dev, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Forest management; Conservation; Ecosystem services; Novel ecosystems; Achievable future conditions; Southeastern United States; WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE; LOWER FLINT RIVER; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES; FIRE; WATER; DROUGHT; RISK; SCIENCE; RESTORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.009
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We contend that traditional approaches to forest conservation and management will be inadequate given the predicted scale of social-economic and biophysical changes in the 21st century. New approaches, focused on anticipating and guiding ecological responses to change, are urgently needed to ensure the full value of forest ecosystem services for future generations. These approaches acknowledge that change is inevitable and sometimes irreversible, and that maintenance of ecosystem services depends in part on novel ecosystems, i.e., species combinations with no analog in the past. We propose that ecological responses be evaluated at landscape or regional scales using risk-based approaches to incorporate uncertainty into forest management efforts with subsequent goals for management based on Achievable Future Conditions (AFC). AFCs defined at a landscape or regional scale incorporate advancements in ecosystem management, including adaptive approaches, resilience, and desired future conditions into the context of the Anthropocene. Inherently forward looking, ACFs encompass mitigation and adaptation options to respond to scenarios of projected future biophysical, social-economic, and policy conditions which distribute risk and provide diversity of response to uncertainty. The engagement of science-management-public partnerships is critical to our risk-based approach for defining AFCs. Robust monitoring programs of forest management actions are also crucial to address uncertainty regarding species distributions and ecosystem processes. Development of regional indicators of response will also be essential to evaluate outcomes of management strategies. Our conceptual framework provides a starting point to move toward AFCs for forest management, illustrated with examples from fire and water management in the Southeastern United States. Our model is adaptive, incorporating evaluation and modification as new information becomes available and as social-ecological dynamics change. It expands on established principles of ecosystem management and best management practices (BMPs) and incorporates scenarios of future conditions. It also highlights the potential limits of existing institutional structures for defining AFCs and achieving them. In an uncertain future of rapid change and abrupt, unforeseen transitions, adjustments in management approaches will be necessary and some actions will fail. However, it is increasingly evident that the greatest risk is posed by continuing to implement strategies inconsistent with current understanding of our novel future. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 96
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supply chain risk management and performance - A guiding framework for future development
    Ritchie, Bob
    Brindley, Clare
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (3-4) : 303 - 322
  • [2] Bounded ranges of variation as a framework for future conservation and fire management
    Moritz, Max A.
    Hurteau, Matthew D.
    Suding, Katharine N.
    D'Antonio, Carla M.
    [J]. YEAR IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2013, 1286 : 92 - 107
  • [3] THE FUTURE OF THAI FOREST CONSERVATION
    LOHMANN, L
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1989, 16 (04) : 362 - 364
  • [4] An analysis framework for linking regeneration standards to desired future forest conditions
    Farnden, Craig
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2009, 85 (02): : 285 - 292
  • [5] A National Geographic Framework for Guiding Conservation on a Landscape Scale
    Millard, Michael J.
    Czarnecki, Craig A.
    Morton, John M.
    Brandt, Laura A.
    Briggs, Jennifer S.
    Shipley, Frank S.
    Sayre, Roger
    Sponholtz, Pamela J.
    Perkins, David
    Simpkins, Darin G.
    Taylor, Janith
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 3 (01): : 175 - 183
  • [6] Applying a metapopulation framework to the management and conservation of a non-timber forest species
    Ticktin, T
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 206 (1-3) : 249 - 261
  • [7] Forest management and species conservation
    Battersby, J
    [J]. ORYX, 1999, 33 (02) : 181 - 182
  • [8] WILDLIFE CONSERVATION IN FOREST MANAGEMENT
    EGGELING, WJ
    [J]. FORESTRY, 1971, : 7 - &
  • [9] Forest management for invertebrate conservation
    de Groot, Maarten
    Zapponi, Livia
    Badano, Davide
    Corezzola, Serena
    Mason, Franco
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2016, 11 : 32 - 37
  • [10] Forest Wildlife Management and Conservation
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    [J]. YEAR IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2009, 2009, 1162 : 284 - 310