Faculty quality at US graduate planning schools - A national research council-style study

Faculty quality assessment methods of the National Research Council study of research doctorate programs are applied to U.S. Urban and regional planning graduate programs. Findings suggest that about. one-half of planning faculty actively publish and that there is considerable concentration of both Publication and citation activity among a relatively small group of scholars and schools. Accredited and nonaccredited schools show substantial differences, as do doctoral degree-graming schools compared with master's-only schools. The strengths and weaknesses of faculty quality measures used are discussed, leading to a call for other Studies rising different measures.