Explaining technological change in the US wind industry: Energy policies, technological learning, and collaboration

被引:27
|
作者
Tang, Tian [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Askew Sch Publ Adm & Policy, 659 Bellamy Bldg,113 Collegiate Loop, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Technological change; Wind power; Learning curves; Renewable energy policies; Deregulation; Collaboration; RENEWABLE ENERGY; PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; DEMAND-PULL; POWER; INNOVATION; EXPERIENCE; CURVES; SPILLOVERS; CHALLENGES; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the drivers of technological change in the US wind industry from perspectives of technological learning, collaboration, and energy policies. Using a panel of 576 utility-scale wind farms between 2001 and 2012, this paper estimates the impacts of different learning mechanisms-learning through research and development in wind turbine manufacturing, learning from a wind farm operator or a turbine manufacturer's previous project experience, learning through collaboration among wind project participants, and knowledge spillovers-on technological change of wind power, measured as improved capacity factor. Empirical findings suggest that a wind farm's performance has improved over time as the project operator accumulates more experience. Moreover, its collaboration with turbine manufacturers and the transmission system operator leads to greater performance improvement, particularly when the transmission system is coordinated by an independent system operator or a regional transmission organization (ISO/RTO). This finding supports the institutional change in the US electricity market deregulation-the creation of ISO/RTOs. The ISO/RTO-govemed transmission networks promote wind power integration through regional collaboration and coordination. In addition, evidence of knowledge spillovers on wind farm operation at the state level provides justifications for state energy policies that subsidize wind power generation.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 212
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND LEARNING IN THE COMPUTER INDUSTRY
    BARR, JL
    KNIGHT, KE
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1968, 14 (11) : 661 - 681
  • [2] Efficiency and technological change in the US brewing industry
    Kerkvliet, JR
    Nebesky, W
    Tremblay, CH
    Tremblay, VJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1998, 10 (03) : 271 - 288
  • [3] Technological change, depletion, and the US petroleum industry
    Cuddington, JT
    Moss, DL
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04): : 1135 - 1148
  • [4] Heterogeneities in energy technological learning: Evidence from the US electricity industry
    Shittu, Ekundayo
    Kamdem, Bruno G.
    Weigelt, Carmen
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 132 : 1034 - 1049
  • [5] Technological learning in the pattern of "technological change-energy efficiency"
    Xu, Guoquan
    Liu, Zeyuan
    Jiang, Zhaohua
    [J]. ISMOT'07: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Management of Technology, Vols 1 and 2: MANAGING TOTAL INNOVATION AND OPEN INNOVATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2007, : 1514 - 1518
  • [6] Are renewable energy policies effective to promote technological change? The role of induced technological risk
    Ye, Fanglin
    Paulson, Nicholas
    Khanna, Madhu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 114
  • [7] Are renewable energy policies effective to promote technological change? The role of induced technological risk
    Ye, Fanglin
    Paulson, Nicholas
    Khanna, Madhu
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2022, 114
  • [9] LEARNING, TRUST, AND TECHNOLOGICAL COLLABORATION
    DODGSON, M
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1993, 46 (01) : 77 - 94
  • [10] TECHNOLOGICAL COLLABORATION IN INDUSTRY - DOGSON,M
    不详
    [J]. SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1993, 35 (01): : 107 - 108