Restructuring seafarers' welfare under the Maritime Labour Convention: an empirical case study of Greece

被引:13
|
作者
Zhang, Pengfei [1 ]
Zhao, Lijun [2 ]
Vata, Olga [3 ]
Rajagopal, Sriram [4 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Maritime Univ, Law Sch, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Middlesex Univ London, Sch Law, London, England
[3] Southampton Solent Univ, Warsash Sch Maritime Sci & Engn, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Anglo Eastern Ship Management, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
Maritime labour convention; Greece; Seafarers; Welfare; Wages; Social security; Onboard and ashore welfare; Empirical case study;
D O I
10.1108/MABR-02-2020-0009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to examine three of the major issues relating to the welfare of seafarers, including wages, social security benefits and onboard and ashore welfare facilities and services. It is impossible to research all countries here, so this paper selects Greece - which is one of today's primary shipping countries as for shipowning, as well as for global supply and demand for seafarers - to conduct an empirical case study. Design/methodology/approach - Based on the existing knowledge and scholarship, and primary data collected in several phases of fieldwork, this paper intends to critically examine three major issues relating to the welfare for Greek seafarers, namely, wages, social security benefits and onboard and ashore welfare facilities and services. Findings - This paper finds that they face poor labour conditions, which are getting worse due to the depressed world and Greek economies and intense financial pressures on shipping companies. The entry into force of the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 has a significant impact on the world maritime industry. Research limitations/implications - This paper critically examines the three major issues relating to the welfare of Greek seafarers. Originality/value - Such issues, which Greece is facing are also common in other countries, so the findings and suggestions revealed from this paper are of importance for the global shipping industry and other states.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 389
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seafarers' welfare: A critical review of the related legal issues under the Maritime Labour Convention 2006
    Exarchopoulos, Georgios
    Zhang, Pengfei
    Pryce-Roberts, Nicola
    Zhao, Minghua
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2018, 93 : 62 - 70
  • [2] Maritime Labour policy in China: Restructuring under the ILO's Maritime Labour Convention 2006
    Zhang, Oengfei
    Zhao, Minghua
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2014, 50 : 111 - 116
  • [3] Global Rights for Seafarers: A New Maritime Labour Convention
    Petrovic, Drazen
    [J]. NASE MORE, 2006, 53 (1-2): : 29 - 33
  • [5] THE SEAFARERS' SOCIAL SECURITY LAW IN THE MARITIME LABOUR CONVENTION, 2006, ILO
    Carril Vazquez, Xose Manuel
    [J]. REVISTA GENERAL DEL DERECHO DEL TRABAJO Y DE LA SEGURIDAD SOCIAL, 2014, (36): : 248 - 261
  • [6] Representation of seafarers' occupational safety and health: Limits of the Maritime Labour Convention
    Graham, Carolyn A. E.
    Walters, David
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND LABOUR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2021, 32 (02): : 266 - 282
  • [7] Assessment of the Legal Regime for Protecting Abandoned Seafarers: A Study in Light of the 2006 Maritime Labour Convention
    Gupta, Mohit
    Shanthakumar, S.
    [J]. OCEAN DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2023, 54 (02): : 181 - 199
  • [8] Assessment of the Maritime Labour Convention Implementation-What Seafarers Care Most?
    Xia, Leilei
    Zheng, Pengjun
    Gao, Geren
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS (SSME 2015), 2015, : 967 - 972
  • [9] Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 and the Chinese seafarers: How far is China to ratification?
    Zhang, Pengfei
    Zhao, Minghua
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2015, 61 : 54 - 65
  • [10] Seafarers' views on the impact of the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 on their living and working conditions: results from a pilot study
    Fotteler, Marina Liselotte
    Jensen, Olaf Chresten
    Andrioti, Despena
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME HEALTH, 2018, 69 (04) : 257 - 263