Weight-management interventions in primary care: a pilot randomised controlled trial

被引:26
|
作者
Nanchahal, Kiran [1 ]
Townsend, Joy
Letley, Louise [2 ]
Haslam, David [3 ]
Wellings, Kaye
Haines, Andy
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Publ & Environm Hlth Res Unit, Dept Publ Hlth & Policy, London WC1E 7HT, England
[2] Med Res Council Gen Practice Res Framework, London, England
[3] Watton Pl Clin, Hertford, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2009年 / 59卷 / 562期
关键词
life style; obesity; overweight; primary health care; weight loss; PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; BODY-MASS INDEX; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; GENERAL-PRACTICE; NATIONAL TRENDS; IMPROVE HEALTH; RISK-FACTORS; OBESITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp09X420617
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background There is a paucity of randomised controlled trials of weight management in primary care. Aim To ascertain the feasibility of a full trial of a nurse-led weight-management programme in general practice. Design of study Factorial randomised control trial. Setting Primary care, UK. Method A total of 123 adults (80.3% women, mean age 47.2 years) with body mass index >= 27 kg/m(2), recruited from eight practices, were randomised to receive structured lifestyle support (n = 30), structured lifestyle support plus pedometer (n = 31), usual care (n = 31), or usual care plus pedometer (n = 31) for a 12-week period. Results A total of 103 participants were successfully followed up. The adjusted mean difference in weight in structured support compared to usual care groups was -2.63 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] = -4.06 to -1.20 kg), and for pedometer compared to no pedometer groups it was -0.11 kg (95% CI = -1.52 to 1.30 kg). One in three participants in the structured-support groups (17/50, 34.0%) lost 5% or more of their initial weight, compared to less than one in five (10/53, 18.9%) in usual-care groups; provision of a pedometer made little difference (14/48, 29.2% pedometer; 13/55, 23.6% no pedometer). Difference in waist circumference change between structured-support and usual-care groups was -1.80 cm (95% CI = -3.39 to -0.20 cm), and between the pedometer and no pedometer groups it was -0.84 cm (95% CI = -2.42 to 0.73 cm). When asked about their experience of study participation, most participants found structured support helpful. Conclusion The structured lifestyle support package could make substantial contributions to improving weight-management services. A trial of the intervention in general practice is feasible and practicable.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 355
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomised controlled trial of educational interventions for dementia diagnosis and management in primary care
    Iliffe, S
    Wilcock, J
    Downs, M
    Turner, S
    Bryans, H
    [J]. NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2002, 23 (01) : S550 - S551
  • [2] Randomised controlled trial of tailored interventions to improve the management of anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care
    Sinnema, Henny
    Franx, Gerdien
    Volker, Danielle
    Majo, Cristina
    Terluin, Berend
    Wensing, Michel
    van Balkom, Anton
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6
  • [3] Randomised controlled trial of tailored interventions to improve the management of anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care
    Henny Sinnema
    Gerdien Franx
    Daniëlle Volker
    Cristina Majo
    Berend Terluin
    Michel Wensing
    Anton van Balkom
    [J]. Implementation Science, 6
  • [4] Self management of arthritis in primary care: randomised controlled trial
    Buszewicz, Marta
    Rait, Greta
    Griffin, Mark
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Patel, Anita
    Atkinson, Angela
    Barlow, Julie
    Haines, Andy
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7574): : 879 - 882A
  • [5] Randomised controlled trial of lifestyle interventions for abdominal obesity in primary health care
    Carrera-Bastos, Pedro
    Rydhog, Bjorn
    Fontes-Villalba, Maelan
    Arvidsson, Daniel
    Granfeldt, Yvonne
    Sundquist, Kristina
    Jonsson, Tommy
    [J]. PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 25
  • [6] Weight-management interventions for pregnant or postpartum women
    Kuhlmann, Anne K. Sebert
    Dietz, Patricia M.
    Galavotti, Christine
    England, Lucinda J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 34 (06) : 523 - 528
  • [7] Primary-Care Weight-Management Strategies: Parental Priorities and Preferences
    Turer, Christy Boling
    Upperman, Carla
    Merchant, Zahra
    Montano, Sergio
    Flores, Glenn
    [J]. ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2016, 16 (03) : 260 - 266
  • [8] Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: costs and benefits in a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Neilson, Aileen R.
    Bruhn, Hanne
    Bond, Christine M.
    Elliott, Alison M.
    Smith, Blair H.
    Hannaford, Philip C.
    Holland, Richard
    Lee, Amanda J.
    Watson, Margaret
    Wright, David
    McNamee, Paul
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (04):
  • [9] Two-Year Results of Think Health! Vive Saludable!: A Primary Care Weight-Management Trial
    Kumanyika, Shiriki K.
    Morales, Knashawn H.
    Allison, Kelly C.
    Localio, A. Russell
    Sarwer, David B.
    Phipps, Etienne
    Fassbender, Jennifer E.
    Tsai, Adam G.
    Wadden, Thomas A.
    [J]. OBESITY, 2018, 26 (09) : 1412 - 1421
  • [10] A randomised controlled trial of three very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
    Sally Pears
    Maaike Bijker
    Katie Morton
    Joana Vasconcelos
    Richard A. Parker
    Kate Westgate
    Soren Brage
    Ed Wilson
    A. Toby Prevost
    Ann-Louise Kinmonth
    Simon Griffin
    Stephen Sutton
    Wendy Hardeman
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 16