Defining and estimating the reliability of physician quality measures in hierarchical logistic regression models

被引:3
|
作者
Hwang, Jessica [1 ]
Adams, John L. [2 ]
Paddock, Susan M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat, Sequoia Hall,390 Jane Stanford Way,Mail Code 4065, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson Sch Med, Kaiser Permanente Ctr Effect & Safety Res, 100 S Los Robles,3rd Floor, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
[3] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA 90401 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, NORC, 55 East Monroe St,31st Floor, Chicago, IL 60603 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Reliability; Physician profiling; Health care quality; Hierarchical logistic regression; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s10742-020-00226-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In healthcare provider profiling, the reliability of a performance measure indicates whether observed differences in patient outcomes can be attributed to genuine differences in quality across providers. While reliability is easy to define, estimate, and interpret when the outcome of interest is continuous and a hierarchical linear model can be assumed, several different definitions and estimators of reliability are in use for performance measures based on binary outcomes. We compare these candidate definitions and estimators when a hierarchical logistic regression model is assumed for the binary outcome. Our simulations revealed important differences across reliability estimators, particularly when the number of patients per provider is low, as expected for physician quality measures. Using claims data on Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries treated by physicians in Florida, we illustrate the practical implications by examining two process-of-care measures collected by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in the U.S. for physician quality reporting.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 130
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining and estimating the reliability of physician quality measures in hierarchical logistic regression models
    Jessica Hwang
    John L. Adams
    Susan M. Paddock
    [J]. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2021, 21 : 111 - 130
  • [2] Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis
    Bender, Ralf
    Kuss, Oliver
    Hildebrandt, Mandy
    Gehrmann, Ulrich
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (30) : 5586 - 5595
  • [3] Estimating Speaker Clustering Quality Using Logistic Regression
    Cohen, Yishai
    Lapidot, Itshak
    [J]. 18TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2017), VOLS 1-6: SITUATED INTERACTION, 2017, : 3577 - 3581
  • [4] Testing in logistic regression models based on φ-divergences measures
    Pardo, JA
    Pardo, L
    Pardo, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2006, 136 (03) : 982 - 1006
  • [5] Computing measures of explained variation for logistic regression models
    Mittlböck, M
    Schemper, M
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1999, 58 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [6] Comparative GMM and GQL logistic regression models on hierarchical data
    Wang, Bei
    Wilson, Jeffrey R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 45 (03) : 409 - 425
  • [7] Generalised additive models and hierarchical logistic regression of lameness in dairy cows
    Hirst, WM
    Murray, RD
    Ward, WR
    French, NP
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2002, 55 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [8] What's the Risk? A Simple Approach for Estimating Adjusted Risk Measures from Nonlinear Models Including Logistic Regression
    Kleinman, Lawrence C.
    Norton, Edward C.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 44 (01) : 288 - 302
  • [9] New Influence Measures in Polytomous Logistic Regression Models Based on Phi-Divergence Measures
    Martin, Nirian
    Pardo, Leandro
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2014, 43 (10-12) : 2311 - 2321
  • [10] Analysis of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) using hierarchical logistic regression models
    Swanson, DB
    Clauser, BE
    Case, SM
    Nungester, RJ
    Featherman, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2002, 27 (01) : 53 - 75