Reproducibility of subjective refraction measurement

被引:9
|
作者
Grein, H-J [1 ,2 ]
Schmidt, O. [2 ]
Ritsche, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fachhsch Lubeck, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Fielmann Akad Schloss Plon, Plon, Germany
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGE | 2014年 / 111卷 / 11期
关键词
Measurement accuracy; Intraindividual variance; Cross-cylinder method; Subject; Examiner; REPEATABILITY; FLUCTUATIONS; ACCOMMODATION; ERROR;
D O I
10.1007/s00347-014-3064-6
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Reproducibility of subjective refraction measurement is limited by various factors. The main factors affecting reproducibility include the characteristics of the measurement method and of the subject and the examiner. This article presents the results of a study on this topic, focusing on the reproducibility of subjective refraction measurement in healthy eyes. The results of previous studies are not all presented in the same way by the respective authors and cannot be fully standardized without consulting the original scientific data. To the extent that they are comparable, the results of our study largely correspond largely with those of previous investigations: During repeated subjective refraction measurement, 95% of the deviation from the mean value was approximately +/- 0.2 D to +/- 0.65 D for the spherical equivalent and cylindrical power. The reproducibility of subjective refraction measurement in healthy eyes is limited, even under ideal conditions. Correct assessment of refraction results is only feasible after identifying individual variability. Several measurements are required. Refraction cannot be measured without a tolerance range. The English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink (under supplemental).
引用
收藏
页码:1057 / 1064
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Repeatability and Reproducibility of Virtual Subjective Refraction
    Perches, Sara
    Collados, M. Victoria
    Ares, Jorge
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2016, 93 (10) : 1243 - 1253
  • [2] Subjective measurement of peripheral refraction
    Colandrea, C.
    Bussa, M. P. B.
    Greco, M.
    Serio, M.
    Chenis, A.
    Gastaldi, M.
    Bellatorre, A.
    DI Benedetto, S.
    [J]. NUOVO CIMENTO C-COLLOQUIA AND COMMUNICATIONS IN PHYSICS, 2024, 47 (05):
  • [3] Comparison of wavefront measurement of refractive error with subjective refraction
    Yee, K
    Tuan, KMA
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U25 - U25
  • [4] Zur Reproduzierbarkeit von RefraktionsbestimmungenReproducibility of subjective refraction measurement
    H.-J. Grein
    O. Schmidt
    A. Ritsche
    [J]. Der Ophthalmologe, 2014, 111 : 1057 - 1064
  • [5] Subjective refraction
    Tenney, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1904, 43 : 2030 - 2031
  • [6] Reproducibility of subjective refraction before and after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia
    Nielsen, Rasmus
    Christiansen, Maja K.
    Kristensen, Marck S.
    Moller, Christina
    Hedegaard, Christian
    Aagaard, Nicolaj
    Sejersen, Henrik
    Hjortdal, Jesper
    Ivarsen, Anders
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2020, 98 (01) : E130 - E131
  • [7] Algorithm based subjective refraction compared to conventional subjective refraction
    Benard, Yohann
    Hoffmann, Julia
    Seidemann, Anne
    Eisenbarth, Werner
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [8] REPRODUCIBILITY OF REFRACTION AND VISUAL-ACUITY MEASUREMENT UNDER A STANDARD PROTOCOL
    BLACKHURST, DW
    MAGUIRE, MG
    [J]. RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 1989, 9 (03): : 163 - 169
  • [9] Method of determining a patient's subjective refraction based on objective measurement
    Lai, S
    Gomez, N
    Wei, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 20 (05) : S528 - S532
  • [10] A Comparison between Automated Subjective Refraction and Traditional Subjective Refraction in Keratoconus Patients
    Carracedo, Gonzalo
    Carpena-Torres, Carlos
    Pastrana, Cristina
    Privado-Aroco, Ana
    Serramito, Maria
    Espinosa-Vidal, Teresa Maria
    Rodriguez-Lafora, Maria
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2021, 98 (06) : 597 - 604