Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis

被引:90
|
作者
Gonzalez, Urba [1 ]
Pinart, Mariona [1 ]
Rengifo-Pardo, Monica [2 ]
Macaya, Antonio [3 ]
Alvar, Jorge [4 ]
Tweed, John A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Plato, Dept Dermatol, Res Unit Evidence Based Dermatol, Barcelona 08006, Catalunya, Spain
[2] Univ Nottingham, Cochrane Skin Grp, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Bellvitge Hosp, Barcelona, Spain
[4] WHO CDS NTD IDM, Geneva 27, Switzerland
关键词
PARENTERAL MEGLUMINE ANTIMONIATE; SODIUM STIBOGLUCONATE PENTOSTAM; TROPICAL DISEASES RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; DOUBLE-BLIND; VISCERAL LEISHMANIASIS; AMAZONENSIS VACCINE; TOPICAL TREATMENT; AMPHOTERICIN-B;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD004834.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Pentavalent antimonial drugs are the most prescribed treatment for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Other drugs have been used with varying success. Objectives To assess the effects of therapeutic interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (January 2009), the Register of Controlled Clinical Trials in The Cochrane Library (Issue 1,2009), MEDLINE (2003 to January 2009), EMBASE (2005 to January 2009), LILACS (from inception to January 2009), CINAHL (1982-May 2007) and other databases. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing treatments for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Main results We included 38 trials involving 2728 participants. Results are based on individual studies or limited pooled analyses. There was good evidence in: Leishmania braziliensis and L. panamensis infections: Intramuscular (IM) meglumine antimoniate (MA) was better than oral allopurinol for 28 days (1RCT n= 127, RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.26, 0.58). Intravenous (IV) MA for 20-days was better than 3-day and 7-day IVMA plus 15% paromomycin plus 12% methylbenzethonium chloride (PR-MBCL) or 7-day IVMA (1RCT n= 150, RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11, 0.50; RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.53, 0.90; RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.44, 0.92 respectively). Oral allopurinol plus antimonials was better than IV antimonials (2RCT n= 168, RR 1.90; 95% CI 1.40, 2.59; I-2= 0%). L. braziliensis infections: Oral pentoxifylline plus IV sodium stibogluconate (SSG) was better than IVSSG (1RCT n= 23, RR 1.66; 95% CI 1.03, 2.69); IVMA was better than IM aminosidine sulphate (1RCT n= 38, RR 0.05; 95% CI 0.00, 0.78) and better than IV pentamidine isethionate (1RCT n= 80, RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.29, 0.71). Intramuscular MA was better than Bacillus Calmette-Guein (1RCT n= 93, RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.32, 0.65). L. panamensis infections: Oral allopurinol was better than IVMA (1RCT n= 58, RR 2.20; 95% CI 1.34, 3.60). Aminosidine sulphate at doses of 12mg/kg/day and 18mg/kg/day for 14 days were better than aminosidine sulphate 12mg/kg/day for 7 days (1RCT n= 60, RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.07, 0.73; RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.07, 0.73 respectively). Oral ketoconazole for 28 days, oral miltefosine and topical PR-MBCL were better than placebo. Authors' conclusions Most trials have been designed and reported so poorly that they are inconclusive. There is a need for large well conducted studies that evaluate long-term effects of current therapies to improve quality and standardization of methods.
引用
收藏
页数:175
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
    Pinart, Mariona
    Rueda, Jose-Ramon
    Romero, Gustavo A. S.
    Pinzon-Florez, Carlos Eduardo
    Osorio-Arango, Karime
    Silveira Maia-Elkhoury, Ana Nilce
    Reveiz, Ludovic
    Elias, Vanessa M.
    Tweed, John A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (08):
  • [2] Interventions for American Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review Update
    Reveiz, Ludovic
    Silveira Maia-Elkhoury, Ana Nilce
    Nicholls, Ruben Santiago
    Sierra Romero, Gustavo Adolfo
    Yadon, Zaida E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [3] AMERICAN CUTANEOUS AND MUCOCUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS (TEGUMENTARY) - A DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGE
    ESCOBAR, MA
    MARTINEZ, F
    SMITH, DS
    PALMA, GI
    [J]. TROPICAL DOCTOR, 1992, 22 : 69 - 78
  • [4] Cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis
    David, Consuelo V.
    Craft, Noah
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, 2009, 22 (06) : 491 - 502
  • [5] EVALUATION OF THE HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF AMERICAN CUTANEOUS AND MUCOCUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS
    BITTENCOURT, AL
    BARRAL, A
    [J]. MEMORIAS DO INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ, 1991, 86 (01): : 51 - 56
  • [6] Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis
    Abadias-Granado, I
    Diago, A.
    Cerro, P. A.
    Palma-Ruiz, A. M.
    Gilaberte, Y.
    [J]. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS, 2021, 112 (07): : 601 - 618
  • [7] Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis
    Goto, Hiro
    Lauletta Lindoso, Jose Angelo
    [J]. INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 26 (02) : 293 - +
  • [8] TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS AND MUCOCUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS
    BLUM, J
    JUNGHANSS, T
    HATZ, C
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1994, 119 (34-35) : 1169 - 1172
  • [9] AMERICAN MUCOCUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS
    LINELL, F
    NORDEN, A
    [J]. NORDISK MEDICIN, 1953, 50 (46) : 1573 - 1575
  • [10] AMERICAN MUCOCUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS
    GOIHMANYAHR, M
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC CLINICS, 1994, 12 (04) : 703 - &