Effectiveness of a 2-Week Strength Training Learning Intervention on Self-selected Weight-Training Intensity

被引:2
|
作者
Glass, Stephen C. [1 ]
Ahmad, Sabrina [1 ]
Gabler, Taylor [1 ]
机构
[1] Grand Valley State Univ, Dept Movement Sci, Human Performance Lab, Allendale, MI 49401 USA
关键词
rate of perceived exertion; self-regulated exercise; imposed exercise intensity; supervised resistance training; RESISTANCE EXERCISE; DIRECT SUPERVISION; LOAD; ADAPTATIONS; ADHERENCE; RESPONSES; NOVICE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000003729
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Glass, SC, Ahmad, S, and Gabler, T. Effectiveness of a 2-week strength training learning intervention on self-selected weight-training intensity.J Strength Cond Res34(9): 2443-2448, 2020-The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an imposed (IM) vs. self-selected (SS) 2-week strength training intervention on SS resistance training intensity. Subjects 18-40 years (SSn= 10 and IMn= 10) were provided resistance training orientation (chest press, leg press, triceps extension, bicep curl, and shoulder press). On 6 different training days, subjects completed 2 sets on each machine while blinded to the load. The SS group SS loads without any intensity or effort feedback. Load, repetitions, and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. The IM group was encouraged to lift to fatigue, and if they exceeded 12 repetitions, subsequent load was increased (goal-attain 70% one repetition maximum [1RM]). After training, SS and IM SS loads and repetitions for all lifts, plus 3 novel lifts (pec fly, leg extension, and shoulder raise). One repetition maximum was assessed last. Comparisons between groups were made using 2-way analysis of variance. There were significant main effects for % 1RM for the condition and day (day 1 IM = 57.2 +/- 12.0%, SS = 47.2 +/- 13.7% and day 6 IM = 74.7 +/- 10.8%, SS = 66.2 +/- 13.4%). There were significant effects across days for reps (day 1 IM = 10.8 +/- 4.8, SS = 12.3 +/- 4.0 and day 6 IM = 9.3 +/- 3.6, SS = 10.0 +/- 3.0) and RPE (day 1 = 15.4 +/- 2.0 and day 6 = 16.5 +/- 1.9). For both SS and IM post-training SS loads exceeded 60% 1RM. However, among the novel lifts, only the pec fly was greater than 60% 1RM (pec fly 63.0 +/- 11.0%, leg extension 39.8 +/- 12.5%, and shoulder raise 53.1 +/- 12.8%). Two weeks of supervised resistance training resulted in both IM and SS self-selecting loads greater than 60% 1RM. There were no differences after 2-weeks of training between IM load and SS load groups.
引用
收藏
页码:2443 / 2448
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Effect of a 2-Week Strength Training Learning Intervention on Self-selected Weight Training Intensity
    Ahmad, Sabrina
    Glass, Steve
    Gabler, Taylor
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (06): : 45 - 45
  • [2] Effect of a Learning Trial on Self-Selected Resistance Training Intensity
    Glass, Steve C.
    Hoffman, Mary M.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S296 - S296
  • [3] Self-selected resistance training intensity in novice weightlifters
    Glass, SC
    Stanton, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2004, 18 (02) : 324 - 327
  • [4] SELF-SELECTED TRAINING INTENSITY ON A STATIONARY CYCLE ERGOMETER
    LYNASS, BA
    POLSON, EB
    WIEKING, KE
    KISPERT, CP
    NIELSEN, DH
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1983, 63 (05): : 762 - 762
  • [5] AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO PRESCRIBED AND SELF-SELECTED STRENGTH TRAINING INTENSITIES
    Portugal, Eduardo M. M.
    Lattari, Eduardo
    Santos, Tony M.
    Deslandes, Andrea C.
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2015, 121 (02) : 465 - 481
  • [6] Is Self-selected Intensity During Weight Training Enough To Promote Health Benefits In Older Women?
    da Silva, Sergio G.
    Elsangedy, Hassan M.
    Krinski, Kleverton
    Krause, Maressa P.
    Freitas, Luis A. G.
    Durigan, Julia Z.
    Dourado, Antonio C.
    Buzzachera, Cosme F.
    Goss, Fredric L.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2012, 44 : 481 - 481
  • [7] EFFECT OF A LEARNING TRIAL ON SELF-SELECTED RESISTANCE TRAINING LOAD
    Glass, Stephen C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2008, 22 (03) : 1025 - 1029
  • [8] Self-selected resistance training intensity in healthy women: The influence of a personal trainer
    Ratamess, Nicholas A.
    Faigenbaum, Avery D.
    Hoffman, Jay R.
    Kang, Jie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2008, 22 (01) : 103 - 111
  • [9] Effects of concurrent training with self-selected intensity on the physical fitness of hypertensive individuals
    de Oliveira, Silas Nery
    Pereira Moro, Antonio Renato
    Ribeiro Domingues, Wagner Jorge
    Bezerra, Ewertton de Souza
    [J]. ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 40
  • [10] Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution
    Rappelt, Ludwig
    Held, Steffen
    Wiedenmann, Tim
    Deutsch, Jan-Philip
    Hochstrate, Jonas
    Wicker, Pamela
    Donath, Lars
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 14