Accuracy of urinary human papillomavirus testing for presence of cervical HPV: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:103
|
作者
Pathak, Neha [1 ]
Dodds, Julie [1 ]
Zamora, Javier [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Khan, Khalid [1 ]
机构
[1] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Womens Hlth Res Unit, Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Blizard Inst, London E1 2AB, England
[2] Hosp Ramon & Cajal IRYCIS, Clin Biostat Unit, Madrid, Spain
[3] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ, Madrid, Spain
来源
关键词
DIAGNOSTIC-TEST ACCURACY; REAL-TIME PCR; DNA DETECTION; PAIRED URINE; SCREENING TOOL; SAMPLES; CANCER; GRADE; WOMEN; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.g5264
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the accuracy of testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in urine in detecting cervical HPV in sexually active women. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Searches of electronic databases from inception until December 2013, checks of reference lists, manual searches of recent issues of relevant journals, and contact with experts. Eligibility criteria Test accuracy studies in sexually active women that compared detection of urine HPV DNA with detection of cervical HPV DNA. Data extraction and synthesis Data relating to patient characteristics, study context, risk of bias, and test accuracy. 2x2 tables were constructed and synthesised by bivariate mixed effects meta-analysis. Results 16 articles reporting on 14 studies (1443 women) were eligible for meta-analysis. Most used commercial polymerase chain reaction methods on first void urine samples. Urine detection of any HPV had a pooled sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval 78% to 92%) and specificity of 94% (95% confidence interval 82% to 98%). Urine detection of high risk HPV had a pooled sensitivity of 77% (68% to 84%) and specificity of 88% (58% to 97%). Urine detection of HPV 16 and 18 had a pooled sensitivity of 73% (56% to 86%) and specificity of 98% (91% to 100%). Metaregression revealed an increase in sensitivity when urine samples were collected as first void compared with random or midstream (P=0.004). Limitations The major limitations of this review are the lack of a strictly uniform method for the detection of HPV in urine and the variation in accuracy between individual studies. Conclusions Testing urine for HPV seems to have good accuracy for the detection of cervical HPV, and testing first void urine samples is more accurate than random or midstream sampling. When cervical HPV detection is considered difficult in particular subgroups, urine testing should be regarded as an acceptable alternative.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF HUMAN AND HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS DNA METHYLATION TESTING IN CERVICAL CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Ellis, Laura Burney
    Tighe, Jack
    Kechagias, Konstantinos
    Flanagan, James
    Kalliala, Ilkka
    Arbyn, Marc
    Veroniki, Areti
    Bowden, Sarah
    Kyrgiou, Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A369 - A369
  • [2] Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yeh, Ping Teresa
    Kennedy, Caitlin E.
    de Vuyst, Hugo
    Narasimhan, Manjulaa
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (03):
  • [3] Accuracy and effectiveness of HPV mRNA testing in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arbyn, Marc
    Simon, Marie
    de Sanjose, Silvia
    Clarke, Megan A.
    Poljak, Mario
    Rezhake, Remila
    Berkhof, Johannes
    Nyaga, Victoria
    Gultekin, Murat
    Canfell, Karen
    Wentzensen, Nicolas
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2022, 23 (07): : 950 - 960
  • [4] Prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Colpani, Veronica
    Falcetta, Frederico Soares
    Bidinotto, Augusto Bacelo
    Kops, Natalia Luiza
    Falavigna, Maicon
    Hammes, Luciano Serpa
    Benzaken, Adele Schwartz
    Kalume Maranhao, Ana Goretti
    Domingues, Carla Magda Allan S.
    Wendland, Eliana Marcia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02):
  • [5] HPV Testing in Primary Cervical Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Murphy, Joan
    Kennedy, Erin B.
    Dunn, Sheila
    McLachlin, C. Meg
    Fung, Michael Fung Kee
    Gzik, Danusia
    Shier, Michael
    Paszat, Lawrence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2012, 34 (05) : 443 - 452
  • [6] Diagnostic accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies
    Koliopoulos, George
    Arbyn, Marc
    Martin-Hirsch, Pierre
    Kyrgiou, Maria
    Prendiville, Walter
    Paraskevaidis, Evangelos
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 104 (01) : 232 - 246
  • [7] Diagnostic Test Accuracy of First-Void Urine Human Papillomaviruses for Presence Cervical HPV in Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bober, Peter
    Firment, Peter
    Sabo, Jan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (24)
  • [8] Persistent human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Koshiol, Jill
    Lindsay, Lisa
    Pimenta, Jeanne M.
    Poole, Charles
    Jenkins, David
    Smith, Jennifer S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 168 (02) : 123 - 137
  • [9] Human Papillomavirus Detectability and Cervical Cancer Prognosis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Volesky-Avellaneda, Karena D.
    Laurie, Cassandra
    Tsyruk-Romano, Olga
    El-Zein, Mariam
    Franco, Eduardo L.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (05): : 1055 - 1067
  • [10] A systematic review and meta-analysis on the attribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) in neuroendocrine cancers of the cervix
    Castle, Philip E.
    Pierz, Amanda
    Stoler, Mark H.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 148 (02) : 422 - 429