Software inspection benchmarking - A qualitative and quantitative comparative opportunity

被引：17
|
作者：
Wohlin, C [1 ]
Aurum, A [1 ]
Petersson, H [1 ]
Shull, F [1 ]
Ciolkowski, M [1 ]
机构：
[1] Blekinge Inst Technol, Dept Software Engn & Comp Sci, SE-37225 Ronneby, Sweden
来源：
EIGHTH IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE METRICS, PROCEEDINGS | 2002年
关键词：
D O I：
10.1109/METRIC.2002.1011331
中图分类号：
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号：
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要：
Software inspections are commonly used throughout the software industry, but there are still open questions about the relationship between inspection processes and inspection effectiveness. For example, which techniques work best in various environments? Are requirements specifications inspections and code inspections different in terms of effectiveness? What is the effectiveness in inspections for different group sizes? Benchmarking provides an opportunity to address such issues. This paper discusses how benchmarking may be applied for software inspections. The discussion is illustrated with an empirical study. It is shown how the data can be used to plan and manage software inspections. It is concluded that software inspections are well suited for benchmarking and that software practitioners as well as researchers can learn valuable lessons.
引用
收藏
页码：118 / 127
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] QUALITATIVE BENCHMARKING STUDY OF SOFTWARE FOR SWITCH PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
    Julca Coscol, Angel Bernardo
    Tapia Prado, Christian David
    Hilario Falcon, Francisco Manuel
    Corpus Giraldo, Cheyer Marcelino
    [J]. 3C TECNOLOGIA, 2021, 10 (04): : 35 - 49
  • [2] Benchmarking machine-learning software and hardware for quantitative economics
    Duarte, Victor
    Duarte, Diogo
    Fonseca, Julia
    Montecinos, Alexis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2020, 111
  • [3] Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Software Divide
    Annechino, Rachelle
    Antin, Tamar M. J.
    Lee, Juliet P.
    [J]. FIELD METHODS, 2010, 22 (02) : 115 - 124
  • [4] Quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis in business
    Huarng, Kun-Huang
    Rey-Marti, Andrea
    Miquel-Romero, Maria-Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 89 : 171 - 174
  • [5] A Comparative Study of Qualitative and Quantitative SNA
    Rani, Poonam
    Bhatia, M. P. S.
    Tayal, D. K.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT (INDIACOM), 2019, : 500 - 504
  • [6] SOFTWARE BENCHMARKING
    JONES, C
    [J]. COMPUTER, 1995, 28 (10) : 102 - 103
  • [7] Improving a Usability Inspection Technique based on Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
    Costa Valentim, Natasha M.
    Conte, Tayana
    [J]. 2014 28TH BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (SBES 2014), 2014, : 171 - 180
  • [8] BENCHMARKING AS OPPORTUNITY FOR MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
    Moraru, Gina-Maria
    Popescu, Liliana Georgeta
    Zerbes, Mihai Victor
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, SOCIOLOGY AND HEALTHCARE, EDUCATION, VOL II, 2015, : 89 - 95
  • [9] Experience on applying quantitative and qualitative empiricism to software engineering
    Ciolkowski, Marcus
    Jedlitschka, Andreas
    [J]. PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4589 : 402 - +
  • [10] A quantitative and qualitative analysis of factors affecting software processes
    Rainer, A
    Hall, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2003, 66 (01) : 7 - 21
12345