A computational simulation study for techno-economic comparison of conventional and stripping gas methods for natural gas dehydration

被引:10
|
作者
Salman, Muhammad [1 ]
Zhang, Liangliang [1 ]
Chen, Jianfeng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Res Ctr, Minist Educ High Grav Engn & Technol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, StateKey Lab Organ Inorgan Composites, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Natural gas dehydration; Technical analysis; Parametric optimization; Economic study; Aspen HYSYS; PERFORMANCE; TEG;
D O I
10.1016/j.cjche.2020.03.013
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In the present work, the conventional natural gas dehydration method (CDM) and stripping gas method (SGM) are technically and economically analyzed, utilizing Aspen HYSYS and Aspen Process Economic Analyzer (APEA), respectively. To optimize the CDM and SGM, the sensitivities of the water content of dry gas, reboiler duty and raw material loss are analyzed against solvent rate and stripping gas rate. The optimized processes are set to achieve a targeted value of water content in dry gas and analyzed at optimized point. The analysis shows that SGM gives 46% lower TEG feed rate, 42% lower reboiler duty and 99.97% pure regenerated TEG. Moreover, economic analysis reveals that SGM has 38% lower annual operating cost compared to CDM. According to results, from both technical and economic point of view, SGM is more feasible for natural gas dehydration compared to CDM. (C) 2020 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2285 / 2293
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A computational simulation study for techno-economic comparison of conventional and stripping gas methods for natural gas dehydration
    Muhammad Salman
    Liangliang Zhang
    Jianfeng Chen
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020, 28 (09) : 2285 - 2293
  • [2] Development of a techno-economic framework for natural gas dehydration via absorption using Tri-Ethylene Glycol: a comparative study on conventional and stripping gas dehydration processes
    Kong, Zong Yang
    Mahmoud, Ahmed
    Liu, Shaomin
    Sunarso, Jaka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 94 (03) : 955 - 963
  • [3] Techno-economic system comparison of a wood gas and a natural gas CHP plant in flexible district heating with a dynamic simulation model
    Koch, Katharina
    Hoefner, Peter
    Gaderer, Matthias
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 202 (202)
  • [4] Techno-economic feasibility of flare gas utilization using adsorbed natural gas
    Muharam, Yuswan
    Giffari, Fiqi
    Mahendra, Mirza
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL TROPICAL RENEWABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE (I-TREC) 2017, 2018, 105
  • [5] RECOVERY OF BUTANOL FROM ABE FERMENTATION BROTH BY GAS STRIPPING: PROCESS SIMULATION AND TECHNO-ECONOMIC EVALUATION
    Lodi, G.
    De Guido, G.
    Pellegrini, L. A.
    [J]. PAPERS OF THE 25TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE, 2017, : 1034 - 1041
  • [6] Techno-Economic assessment of natural gas pyrolysis in molten salts
    Pruvost, Florian
    Cloete, Schalk
    Cloete, Jan Hendrik
    Dhoke, Chaitanya
    Zaabout, Abdelghafour
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 253
  • [7] TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A BUTANOL RECOVERY PROCESS BASED ON GAS STRIPPING TECHNIQUE
    Salemme, Lucia
    Olivieri, Giuseppe
    Raganati, Francesca
    Salatino, Piero
    Marzocchella, Antonio
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 16 (04): : 1005 - 1016
  • [8] Comparison of three methods for natural gas dehydration
    Netusil, Michal
    Ditl, Pavel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS CHEMISTRY, 2011, 20 (05): : 471 - 476
  • [9] Comparison of three methods for natural gas dehydration
    Michal Netusil
    Pavel Ditl
    [J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2011, 20 (05) : 471 - 476
  • [10] Techno-Economic Assessment of Turboexpander Application at Natural Gas Regulation Stations
    Kuczynski, Szymon
    Laciak, Mariusz
    Olijnyk, Andrzej
    Szurlej, Adam
    Wlodek, Tomasz
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (04)