Natural Science and Supernatural Thought Experiments

被引:0
|
作者
Brown, James Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Philosophy, Toronto, ON M5R 2M8, Canada
来源
RELIGIONS | 2019年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
thought experiment; God; Newton-Leibniz; mathematical methods;
D O I
10.3390/rel10060389
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
Religious notions have long played a role in epistemology. Theological thought experiments, in particular, have been effective in a wide range of situations in the sciences. Some of these are merely picturesque, others have been heuristically important, and still others, as I will argue, have played a role that could be called essential. I will illustrate the difference between heuristic and essential with two examples. One of these stems from the Newton-Leibniz debate over the nature of space and time; the other is a thought experiment of my own constructed with the aim of making a case for a more liberal view of evidence in mathematics.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条