Life cycle assessment of biomass pellets: A review of methodological choices and results

被引:36
|
作者
Martin-Gamboa, Mario [1 ]
Marques, Pedro [2 ]
Freire, Fausto [2 ]
Arroja, Luis [1 ]
Dias, Ana Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Dept Environm & Planning, Ctr Environm & Marine Studies CESAM, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Dept Mech Engn, ADAI, Coimbra, Portugal
来源
关键词
Bioenergy; Global warming; Harmonisation; Life cycle assessment; Multifunctionality; Non-renewable primary energy; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DEPENDENT CLIMATE IMPACT; WOOD PELLET; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; HEAT-PRODUCTION; HIGH-EFFICIENCY; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; THERMAL-ENERGY; STRAW PELLETS; FUEL PELLETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110278
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of biomass pellets as fuel is emerging as a suitable alternative to fossil resources for mitigating climate change. A considerable number of articles have applied Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to quantify and to compare the environmental performance of biomass pellets but a wide variation of results can be found in the literature. This work reviews 84 articles on LCA of biomass pellets, focusing on identifying trends in methodological choices and on understanding the influence of those choices on life cycle impacts, in particular global warming and nonrenewable primary energy. Most of the reviewed articles assess woody pellets and most of the cradle-to-grave studies focus on heat generation. The methodological choices vary widely between articles with respect to approach (attributional or consequential), functional unit, system boundaries, procedure to deal with multifunctionality and allocation, biogenic carbon modelling, inclusion of greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide, life cycle impact assessment method, impact categories, and presence of sensitivity analysis. The results for global warming and non-renewable primary energy were assessed, showing a correlation between them. Moreover, a high variability is found for global warming, with impacts ranging from -18 to 488 g CO2 eq/ MJ(pellets). The main causes (technological features, assumptions, methodological choices) for this high variability are analysed and discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of hydrogen energy systems: a review of methodological choices
    Valente, Antonio
    Iribarren, Diego
    Dufour, Javier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (03): : 346 - 363
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of hydrogen energy systems: a review of methodological choices
    Antonio Valente
    Diego Iribarren
    Javier Dufour
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 346 - 363
  • [3] Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen: A Systematic Review of Methodological Choices
    Martinez, Gustavo Ezequiel
    Degens, Roel
    Espadas-Aldana, Gabriela
    Costa, Daniele
    Cardellini, Giuseppe
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (17)
  • [4] A systematic review and life cycle assessment of biomass pellets and briquettes production in Latin America
    Silva, D. A. L.
    Filleti, R. A. P.
    Musule, R.
    Matheus, T. T.
    Freire, F.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 157
  • [5] Effect of Methodological Choices on Pavement Life-Cycle Assessment
    Yang, Rebekah
    Al-Qadi, Imad L.
    Ozer, Hasan
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2018, 2672 (40) : 78 - 87
  • [6] Life-cycle assessment of hydrogen utilization in power generation: A systematic review of technological and methodological choices
    Rinawati, Dyah Ika
    Keeley, Alexander Ryota
    Takeda, Shutaro
    Managi, Shunsuke
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 3
  • [7] Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: a review
    Osman, Ahmed, I
    Mehta, Neha
    Elgarahy, Ahmed M.
    Al-Hinai, Amer
    Al-Muhtaseb, Ala'a H.
    Rooney, David W.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2021, 19 (06) : 4075 - 4118
  • [8] Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: a review
    Ahmed I. Osman
    Neha Mehta
    Ahmed M. Elgarahy
    Amer Al-Hinai
    Ala’a H. Al-Muhtaseb
    David W. Rooney
    [J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2021, 19 : 4075 - 4118
  • [9] Harmonising methodological choices in life cycle assessment of hydrogen: A focus on acidification and renewable hydrogen
    Valente, Antonio
    Iribarren, Diego
    Dufour, Javier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (35) : 19426 - 19433
  • [10] Life-Cycle Assessment of Consumer Electronics A review of methodological approaches
    Andrae, Anders S. G.
    [J]. IEEE CONSUMER ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE, 2016, 5 (01) : 51 - 60