A quality systems approach for identifying and controlling sources of error with point of care testing devices

被引:0
|
作者
Ehrmeyer, SS [1 ]
Laessig, RH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
quality systems; point-of-care testing; decentralized testing; quality assurance; quality control; quality practices; error rate detection;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-002-0525-4
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Historically, due to the size and nature of the instrumentation, highly skilled laboratory professionals performed clinical testing in centralized laboratories. Today's clinicians demand realtime test data at the point of care. This has led to a new generation of compact, portable instruments permitting "laboratory" testing to be performed at or near the patient's bedside by nonlaboratory workers who are unfamiliar with testing practices. Poorly controlled testing processes leading to poor quality test results are an insidious problem facing point of care testing today. Manufacturers are addressing this issue through instrument design. Providers of clinical test results, regardless of location, working with manufacturers and regulators must create and manage complete test systems that eliminate or minimize sources of error. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) in its EP18 guideline, "Quality management for unit-use testing," has developed a quality management system approach specifically for test devices used for point of care testing (POCT). Simply stated, EP18 utilizes a "sources of error" matrix to identify and address potential errors that can impact the test result. The key is the quality systems approach where all stakeholders - professionals, manufacturers and regulators - collaboratively seek ways to manage errors and ensure quality. We illustrate the use of one quality systems approach, EP18, as a means to advance the quality of test results at point of care.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 454
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A quality systems approach for identifying and controlling sources of error with point of care testing devices
    S. S. Ehrmeyer
    Ronald H. Laessig
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002, 7 : 450 - 454
  • [2] Identifying sources of error and selecting quality indicators for point of care testing
    Brun, Miranda
    Fuzery, Anna K.
    Henschke, Bailey
    Rozak, Kallie
    Venner, Allison A.
    [J]. PRACTICAL LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 25
  • [3] Patient safety and sources of error in point-of-care testing
    Meier, Frederick A.
    Jones, Bruce
    [J]. LABORATORIUMSMEDIZIN-JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 34 (03): : 141 - 147
  • [4] Quality Error Rates in Point-of-Care Testing
    O'Kane, Maurice J.
    McManus, Paul
    McGowan, Noel
    Lynch, P. L. Mark
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 57 (09) : 1267 - 1271
  • [5] Quality in point of care testing
    Giavarina, Davide
    Villani, Adele
    Caputo, Marco
    [J]. BIOCHEMIA MEDICA, 2010, 20 (02) : 200 - 206
  • [6] Point-of-care testing error - Sources and amplifiers, taxonomy, prevention strategies, and detection monitors
    Meier, FA
    Jones, BA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2005, 129 (10) : 1262 - 1267
  • [7] Electrochemiluminescence devices for point-of-care testing
    Ying, Xudong
    Zhou, Lin
    Fu, Wenxuan
    Wang, Yafeng
    Su, Bin
    [J]. SENSORS & DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 2 (03): : 480 - 491
  • [8] Quality in point-of-care testing
    Nichols, JH
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2003, 3 (05) : 563 - 572
  • [9] Flexible Analytical Devices for Point-of-Care Testing
    Tsutsui, Hideaki
    Lillehoj, Peter B.
    [J]. SLAS TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 25 (01): : 6 - 8
  • [10] Evaluation and quality assessment of glucose concentration measurement in blood by point-of-care testing devices
    Wehmeier, Michael
    Arndt, Burkhard T.
    Schumann, Gerhard
    Kulpmann, Wolf R.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2006, 44 (07) : 888 - 893