The MISSED score, a new scoring system to predict Mortality In Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department: a derivation and validation study

被引:24
|
作者
Sivayoham, Narani [1 ]
Rhodes, Andrew [2 ]
Cecconi, Maurizio [2 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust, Dept Emergency Med, London SW17 0QT, England
[2] St Georges Healthcare NHS Trust, Dept Intens Care Med, London SW17 0QT, England
关键词
age factors; clinical prediction rule; emergency medicine; international normalized ratio; mortality; sepsis; septic shock; serum albumin; severe sepsis; GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY; SEPTIC SHOCK; HYPOALBUMINEMIA; COAGULATION;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328364a8d4
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo derive and validate a new scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in septic patients in the emergency department (ED).Patients and methodSeptic patients admitted to the ICU and those in whom early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) was carried out in the ED were identified from the ED record. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified independent variables associated with mortality. The variables were given a score weighted by the odds ratio, the sum of which yielded the Mortality In Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department (MISSED) score. The performance of the MISSED score in predicting mortality was compared with that of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, the EGDT criteria and the severe sepsis criteria. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed to calibrate the model.ResultsIndependent variables identified were age at least 65 years, albumin level up to 27 g/l and international normalized ratio of 1.2 or more. The MISSED score ranged from 0-9; cut-off point 5.5. Mortality rates associated with a score of 0, less than 5.5 and 5.5 or more were 7.4, 17.7 and 40.6%, respectively. The sensitivity of the score was 96.8% (95% confidence interval 87.8-99.4%). The mortality rate and specificity associated with a score of 9 were 62.9 and 91.6% respectively. The area under the curve for the MISSED score and the APACHE II score were equal. The performance of the MISSED score of 5.5 or more in predicting mortality was similar to that of the EGDT criteria. The sensitivity of the score was equal to that for the severe sepsis criteria. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed good calibration.ConclusionThe MISSED score should be used in the ED. (C) 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] External validation of the MISSED score to predict mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department
    Ryoo, Seung Mok
    Ahn, Shin
    Kim, Won Young
    Lim, Kyoung Soo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (05) : 327 - 330
  • [2] The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study
    Sivayoham, Narani
    Blake, Lesley A.
    Tharimoopantavida, Shafi E.
    Chughtai, Saad
    Hussain, Adil N.
    Cecconi, Maurizio
    Rhodes, Andrew
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [3] A New Scoring System for Predicting Mortality in Hematological Malignancies with Sepsis: A Derivation and Validation Study
    Li, Haitao
    Fan, Shengjin
    Lu, Dongxue
    Zhou, Jin
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2023, 15 : 1073 - 1083
  • [4] Validation of the mortality in emergency department sepsis (MEDS) score in a Singaporean cohort
    Pong, Jeremy Zhenwen
    Koh, Zhi Xiong
    Samsudin, Mas'uud Ibnu
    Fook-Chong, Stephanie
    Liu, Nan
    Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (34)
  • [5] Internal emergency department validation of the simplified MISSED score
    Sivayoham, Narani
    Holmes, Paul
    Cecconi, Maurizio
    Rhodes, Andrew
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (05) : 321 - 326
  • [6] Predictive accuracy of a sepsis-related mortality score in the emergency department: A modification of the mortality in emergency department sepsis (MEDS) score
    Sankoff, J.
    Deitch, K.
    Goyal, M.
    Gaieski, D. F.
    Haukoos, J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (04) : S47 - S47
  • [7] Comparison of six scoring systems for predicting the mortality of severe sepsis patients in the emergency department
    Liu, Si-jia
    Hu, Hai
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (05): : 902 - 904
  • [8] Derivation and internal validation of the screening to enhance prehospital identification of sepsis (SEPSIS) score in adults on arrival at the emergency department
    Michael A. Smyth
    Daniel Gallacher
    Peter K. Kimani
    Mark Ragoo
    Matthew Ward
    Gavin D. Perkins
    [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 27
  • [9] Derivation and internal validation of the screening to enhance prehospital identification of sepsis (SEPSIS) score in adults on arrival at the emergency department
    Smyth, Michael A.
    Gallacher, Daniel
    Kimani, Peter K.
    Ragoo, Mark
    Ward, Matthew
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 27 (1):
  • [10] Performance of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score for predicting in-hospital mortality among emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock
    Jones, A. E.
    Saak, K.
    Wooten, J.
    Kline, J. A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 50 (03) : S61 - S61