A Fully Sequential Elimination Procedure for Indifference-Zone Ranking and Selection with Tight Bounds on Probability of Correct Selection

被引:43
|
作者
Frazier, Peter I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sch Operat Res & Informat Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SIMULATED SYSTEM; INFORMATION; POPULATION; 2-STAGE;
D O I
10.1287/opre.2014.1282
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We consider the indifference-zone (IZ) formulation of the ranking and selection problem with independent normal samples. In this problem, we must use stochastic simulation to select the best among several noisy simulated systems, with a statistical guarantee on solution quality. Existing IZ procedures sample excessively in problems with many alternatives, in part because loose bounds on probability of correct selection lead them to deliver solution quality much higher than requested. Consequently, existing IZ procedures are seldom considered practical for problems with more than a few hundred alternatives. To overcome this, we present a new sequential elimination IZ procedure, called BIZ (Bayes-inspired indifference zone), whose lower bound on worst-case probability of correct selection in the preference zone is tight in continuous time, and nearly tight in discrete time. To the author's knowledge, this is the first sequential elimination procedure with tight bounds on worst-case preference-zone probability of correct selection for more than two alternatives. Theoretical results for the discrete-time case assume that variances are known and have an integer multiple structure, but the BIZ procedure itself can be used when these assumptions are not met. In numerical experiments, the sampling effort used by BIZ is significantly smaller than that of another leading IZ procedure, the KN procedure, especially on the largest problems tested (2(14) = 16 1 384 alternatives).
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 942
页数:17
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] A Fully Sequential Procedure for Indifference-Zone Selection in Simulation
    Kim, Seong-Hee
    Nelson, Barry L.
    [J]. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 2001, 11 (03): : 251 - 273
  • [2] An indifference-zone selection procedure with minimum switching and sequential sampling
    Hong, LJ
    Nelson, BL
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 474 - 480
  • [3] INPUT UNCERTAINTY AND INDIFFERENCE-ZONE RANKING & SELECTION
    Song, Eunhye
    Nelson, Barry L.
    Hong, L. Jeff
    [J]. 2015 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2015, : 414 - 424
  • [4] Fully sequential indifference-zone selection procedures with variance-dependent sampling
    Hong, L. Jeff
    [J]. NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 2006, 53 (05) : 464 - 476
  • [5] A genetic algorithm and an indifference-zone ranking and selection framework for simulation optimization
    Hedlund, HE
    Mollaghasemi, M
    [J]. WSC'01: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 417 - 421
  • [6] On the probability of correct selection in the Levin-Robbins sequential elimination procedure
    Leu, CS
    Levin, B
    [J]. STATISTICA SINICA, 1999, 9 (03) : 879 - 891
  • [7] Analyzing continuous randomized response data with an indifference-zone selection procedure
    Elkadry, Alaa
    McDonald, Gary C.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2018, 47 (14) : 3508 - 3522
  • [8] An odds-ratio indifference-zone selection procedure for Bernoulli populations
    Wieland, JR
    Nelson, BL
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 630 - 638
  • [9] Reducing the Conservativeness of Fully Sequential Indifference-Zone Procedures
    Wang, Huizhu
    Kim, Seong-Hee
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2013, 58 (06) : 1613 - 1619
  • [10] Inferences from indifference-zone selection procedures
    Chen, EJ
    Kelton, WD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 456 - 464