A cascaded life cycle: reuse of electric vehicle lithium-ion battery packs in energy storage systems

被引:235
|
作者
Ahmadi, Leila [1 ]
Young, Steven B. [2 ]
Fowler, Michael [3 ]
Fraser, Roydon A. [4 ]
Achachlouei, Mohammad Ahmadi [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Canada, Energy Min & Environm, 1200 Montreal Rd, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Enterprise & Dev, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Chem Engn, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Waterloo, Dept Mech & Mechatron Engn, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[5] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Div Environm Strategies Res Fms, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Ctr Sustainable Commun CESC, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Electric vehicle; Energy storage systems (ESS); Life cycle assessment (LCA); Li-ion battery; Resource efficiency; Reuse; Second use; IMPACT; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-015-0959-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery packs recovered from end-of-life electric vehicles (EV) present potential technological, economic and environmental opportunities for improving energy systems and material efficiency. Battery packs can be reused in stationary applications as part of a "smart grid", for example to provide energy storage systems (ESS) for load leveling, residential or commercial power. Previous work on EV battery reuse has demonstrated technical viability and shown energy efficiency benefits in energy storage systems modeled under commercial scenarios. The current analysis performs a life cycle assessment (LCA) study on a Li-ion battery pack used in an EV and then reused in a stationary ESS. A complex functional unit is used to combine energy delivered by the battery pack from the mobility function and the stationary ESS. Various scenarios of cascaded "EV mobility plus reuse in stationary clean electric power scenarios" are contrasted with "conventional system mobility with internal combustion engine vehicles plus natural gas peaking power." Eight years are assumed for first use; with 10 years for reuse in the stationary application. Operational scenarios and environmental data are based on real time-of-day and time-of-year power use. Additional data from LCA databases are utilized. Ontario, Canada, is used as the geographic baseline; analysis includes sensitivity to the electricity mix and battery degradation. Seven environmental categories are assessed using ReCiPe. Results indicate that the manufacturing phase of the Li-ion battery will still dominate environmental impacts across the extended life cycle of the pack (first use in vehicle plus reuse in stationary application). For most impact categories, the cascaded use system appears significantly beneficial compared to the conventional system. By consuming clean energy sources for both use and reuse, global and local environmental stress reductions can be supported. Greenhouse gas advantages of vehicle electrification can be doubled by extending the life of the EV batteries, and enabling better use of off-peak low-cost clean electricity or intermittent renewable capacity. However, questions remain concerning implications of long-duration use of raw material resources employed before potential recycling. Li-ion battery packs present opportunities for powering both mobility and stationary applications in the necessary transition to cleaner energy. Battery state-of-health is a considerable determinant in the life cycle performance of a Li-ion battery pack. The use of a complex functional unit was demonstrated in studying a component system with multiple uses in a cascaded application.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 124
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A cascaded life cycle: reuse of electric vehicle lithium-ion battery packs in energy storage systems
    Leila Ahmadi
    Steven B. Young
    Michael Fowler
    Roydon A. Fraser
    Mohammad Ahmadi Achachlouei
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 111 - 124
  • [2] Performance of Inconsistency in Lithium-ion Battery Packs for Battery Energy Storage Systems
    Chen, Man
    Zhang, Baihua
    Li, Yongqi
    Qi, Guoguang
    Yang, Daiming
    Liu, Jianzheng
    [J]. 2014 IEEE PES ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (IEEE PES APPEEC), 2014,
  • [3] Life Cycle Assessment of a Lithium-Ion Battery Vehicle Pack
    Ellingsen, Linda Ager-Wick
    Majeau-Bettez, Guillaume
    Singh, Bhawna
    Srivastava, Akhilesh Kumar
    Valoen, Lars Ole
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 18 (01) : 113 - 124
  • [4] The Cobalt Supply Chain and Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage Systems
    Das, Jani
    Kleiman, Andrew
    Rehman, Atta Ur
    Verma, Rahul
    Young, Michael H.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [5] Prognostics of the state of health for lithium-ion battery packs in energy storage applications
    Chang, Chun
    Wu, Yutong
    Jiang, Jiuchun
    Jiang, Yan
    Tian, Aina
    Li, Taiyu
    Gao, Yang
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [6] Safer lithium-ion battery packs an energy punch
    Patel, Prachi
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2019, 97 (19) : 8 - 8
  • [7] Comparative analysis of the supercapacitor influence on lithium battery cycle life in electric vehicle energy storage
    Vukajlovic, Nikola
    Milicevic, Dragan
    Dumnic, Boris
    Popadic, Bane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 31
  • [8] Evaluating Real-Life Performance of Lithium-Ion Battery Packs in Electric Vehicles
    Klass, Verena
    Behm, Marten
    Lindbergh, Goran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 159 (11) : A1856 - A1860
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles' lithium-ion batteries reused for energy storage
    Fan, Tao
    Liang, Weicheng
    Guo, Wei
    Feng, Tao
    Li, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2023, 71
  • [10] A comparative life cycle assessment on lithium-ion battery: Case study on electric vehicle battery in China considering battery evolution
    Wang, Shuoyao
    Yu, Jeongsoo
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2021, 39 (01) : 156 - 164