Neonatal outcomes among singleton births after blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:95
|
作者
Dar, S. [1 ,2 ]
Lazer, T. [1 ,2 ]
Shah, P. S. [3 ,4 ]
Librach, C. L. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] CReATe Fertil Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON M5G 1L4, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Pediat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Pediat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[5] Womens Coll Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON M5S 1B1, Canada
关键词
blastocyst; cleavage stage embryo; preterm labor; congenital anomalies; neonatal outcomes; IN-VITRO CULTURE; PRETERM DELIVERY; EXTENDED CULTURE; INCREASED RISK; PREGNANCY; FRESH; TERM;
D O I
10.1093/humupd/dmu001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Several studies have evaluated outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer. Higher incidences of preterm birth (PTB), very preterm birth (VPTB), low birthweight (LBW) and congenital malformations were identified in a few of them. The objective of our study was to systematically review and meta-analyze pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among singleton births following blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer. EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBM Reviews and bibliographies of included studies were searched from their inception until March 2013. Observational studies or clinical trials comparing blastocyst with cleavage stage embryo transfer and reporting on outcomes of PTB (37 weeks), VPTB (32 weeks), LBW (2500 g), very low birthweight (VLBW) (1500 g) and/or congenital anomalies in singleton neonates were included. Data on the outcomes were extracted by two reviewers. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was evaluated by calculating I-2 values and (2) statistics. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the pooled unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and the adjusted OR (AOR) with a 95 confidence interval (CI) using the random effect model. Six observational studies, of low to moderate risk of bias, were included in this review. There were significantly higher odds of PTB (four studies, 54 792 cleavage stage and 20 724 blastocyst stage births; AOR 1.32, 95 CI 1.191.46) and congenital anomalies (two studies, 22 068 cleavage stage and 4517 blastocyst stage births; AOR 1.29, 95 CI 1.031.62) among births after blastocyst transfer compared with cleavage stage transfer. There was no difference in the adjusted odds of VPTB (four studies, 54 792 cleavage stage and 20 724 blastocyst stage births; AOR 1.18, 95 CI 0.931.49), LBW (four studies, 54 109 cleavage stage and 20 392 blastocyst stage births; AOR 1.06, 95 CI 0.991.15) or VLBW (three studies, 22 088 cleavage stage and 5772 blastocyst stage births; AOR 1.01, 95 CI 0.731.38). Risk of PTB in IVF singleton pregnancies is significantly higher following blastocyst transfer compared with cleavage stage transfer. Risk of congenital anomalies may also be higher but further studies are needed to confirm this finding and to identify reasons for such outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 448
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SINGLETON PREGNANCY OUTCOMES AFTER BLASTOCYST VERSUS CLEAVAGE STAGE EMBRYO TRANSFER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
    Dar, S.
    Lazer, T.
    Shah, P.
    Librach, C.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S248 - S249
  • [2] Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Xingling
    Du, Mingze
    Guan, Yichun
    Wang, Bijun
    Zhang, Junwei
    Liu, Zihua
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 15
  • [3] Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xingling Wang
    Mingze Du
    Yichun Guan
    Bijun Wang
    Junwei Zhang
    Zihua Liu
    [J]. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 15
  • [4] Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared with those after cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis
    Marconi, Nicola
    Allen, Christopher Patrick
    Bhattacharya, Siladitya
    Maheshwari, Abha
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2022, 28 (02) : 255 - 281
  • [5] Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer
    Boerwinkle, Caroline H.
    Tolcher, Mary C.
    Hoff, Heather S.
    Aagaard, Kjersti M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S545 - S545
  • [6] Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis
    Marconi, N.
    Allen, C.
    Bhattacharya, S.
    Maheshwari, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 490 - 490
  • [7] Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes
    Martins, W. P.
    Nastri, C. O.
    Rienzi, L.
    Van der Poel, S. Z.
    Gracia, C.
    Racowsky, C.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (05) : 583 - 591
  • [8] Single blastocyst stage versus single cleavage stage embryo transfer following fresh transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yutao
    Liu, Siqiao
    Lv, Qun
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 267 : 11 - 17
  • [9] Pregnancy outcomes after day 5 versus day 6 blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yi-xin
    Wang, Jin
    Sun, Tian-ze
    Lv, Mo-qi
    Ge, Pan
    Li, Hao-nan
    Zhou, Dang-xia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (04) : 595 - 605
  • [10] Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alviggi, C.
    Conforti, A.
    Carbone, I. F.
    Borrelli, R.
    De Placido, G.
    Guerriero, S.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 51 (01) : 54 - 63